Artwork

Content provided by Open to Debate. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Open to Debate or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

#123 - Climate Change: Has the EPA Gone Overboard?

55:45
 
Share
 

Manage episode 205519496 series 2300998
Content provided by Open to Debate. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Open to Debate or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

Reducing carbon emissions is clearly good for the environment but often imposes substantial costs. The costs are most obvious when coal companies go bankrupt, but can affect everyone indirectly through higher energy costs, slower economic growth, reduced employment, and lower business profits. Has the Environmental Protection Agency considered the costs and benefits of its regulatory mandates fairly and appropriately? Is its Clean Power Plan a bold initiative to reduce carbon pollution at power plants, or an unconstitutional usurpation of power?

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

  continue reading

369 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 205519496 series 2300998
Content provided by Open to Debate. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Open to Debate or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

Reducing carbon emissions is clearly good for the environment but often imposes substantial costs. The costs are most obvious when coal companies go bankrupt, but can affect everyone indirectly through higher energy costs, slower economic growth, reduced employment, and lower business profits. Has the Environmental Protection Agency considered the costs and benefits of its regulatory mandates fairly and appropriately? Is its Clean Power Plan a bold initiative to reduce carbon pollution at power plants, or an unconstitutional usurpation of power?

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

  continue reading

369 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide