Go offline with the Player FM app!
Episode 141: The Picard Meltdown Principle
Archived series ("HTTP Redirect" status)
Replaced by: Oral Argument
When? This feed was archived on January 19, 2018 10:53 (). Last successful fetch was on January 19, 2018 11:48 ()
Why? HTTP Redirect status. The feed permanently redirected to another series.
What now? If you were subscribed to this series when it was replaced, you will now be subscribed to the replacement series. This series will no longer be checked for updates. If you believe this to be in error, please check if the publisher's feed link below is valid and contact support to request the feed be restored or if you have any other concerns about this.
Manage episode 182472763 series 1298800
Leah Litman joins us to discuss the problematic argument that a law’s novelty is a reason to believe it is unconstitutional. In particular, she focuses on arguments that statutes that affect the separation of powers or the federalism balance are suspect if they are somehow unprecedented. Also, brief updates on: a wasp, Joe’s living situation, Christian’s health, Leah’s bee-related flight delay.
This show’s links:
- Leah Litman’s faculty profile and writing
- Leah Litman, Debunking Antinovelty
- First Mondays
- United States v. Windsor; Romer v. Evans
- Printz v. United States; Free Enterprise Fund v. PCAOB; NFIB v. Sibelius (Obamacare I)
- Cass Sunstein, Incompletely Theorized Agreements
- PHH Corp. v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
- Karl Llewellyn, The Bramble Bush: On Our Law and Its Study
Special Guest: Leah Litman.
159 episodes
Archived series ("HTTP Redirect" status)
Replaced by: Oral Argument
When? This feed was archived on January 19, 2018 10:53 (). Last successful fetch was on January 19, 2018 11:48 ()
Why? HTTP Redirect status. The feed permanently redirected to another series.
What now? If you were subscribed to this series when it was replaced, you will now be subscribed to the replacement series. This series will no longer be checked for updates. If you believe this to be in error, please check if the publisher's feed link below is valid and contact support to request the feed be restored or if you have any other concerns about this.
Manage episode 182472763 series 1298800
Leah Litman joins us to discuss the problematic argument that a law’s novelty is a reason to believe it is unconstitutional. In particular, she focuses on arguments that statutes that affect the separation of powers or the federalism balance are suspect if they are somehow unprecedented. Also, brief updates on: a wasp, Joe’s living situation, Christian’s health, Leah’s bee-related flight delay.
This show’s links:
- Leah Litman’s faculty profile and writing
- Leah Litman, Debunking Antinovelty
- First Mondays
- United States v. Windsor; Romer v. Evans
- Printz v. United States; Free Enterprise Fund v. PCAOB; NFIB v. Sibelius (Obamacare I)
- Cass Sunstein, Incompletely Theorized Agreements
- PHH Corp. v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
- Karl Llewellyn, The Bramble Bush: On Our Law and Its Study
Special Guest: Leah Litman.
159 episodes
All episodes
×Welcome to Player FM!
Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.