Perioperative Neuraxial Block - Safety, Outcomes and Statistics

BJA: British Journal of Anaesthesia

Content provided by Oxford University Press, Rik Thomas, and Podcast Editor. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Oxford University Press, Rik Thomas, and Podcast Editor or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

10+ y ago 21:24

MP3•Episode home

Archived series ("Inactive feed" status)

When? This feed was archived on January 25, 2021 21:08 (3y ago). Last successful fetch was on July 08, 2019 01:14 (5y ago)

Why? Inactive feed status. Our servers were unable to retrieve a valid podcast feed for a sustained period.

What now? You might be able to find a more up-to-date version using the search function. This series will no longer be checked for updates. If you believe this to be in error, please check if the publisher's feed link below is valid and contact support to request the feed be restored or if you have any other concerns about this.

As the the debate over perioperative neuraxial blockade rages on, more fuel is added to the fire in the form of a controversial secondary analysis carved from the original POISE data set. The authors have used propensity score matching to manipulate the POISE study group into those who received a perioperative neuraxial block and those who did not, with thought provoking results. In this podcast Professor Tim Cook talks about the complex statistical methods used in this paper, and guides us through his interpretation of this important piece of work.

48 episodes

#Science #Medicine #Oxford University Press #Rik Thomas #Editors