Artwork

Content provided by Niskanen Center - The Science of Politics and Niskanen Center. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Niskanen Center - The Science of Politics and Niskanen Center or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Interpreting the 2018 Election

35:01
 
Share
 

Manage episode 221604428 series 1740975
Content provided by Niskanen Center - The Science of Politics and Niskanen Center. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Niskanen Center - The Science of Politics and Niskanen Center or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
What are the implications of the 2018 election results? Julia Azari and Rachel Bitecofer are two political scientists who followed it closely and know how it compares to prior cycles. Azari is an election analyst and party scholar who finds that politicians claim electoral mandates for action based on the results of elections. We talk about early interpretations of 2018 as a referendum on Trump and why we simplify election results with stories. Bitecofer is an election analyst and a forecaster of the 2018 election who finds that demographics and partisanship are now destiny. We talk about why negative partisanship makes election results easier to foresee as partisans choose clear sides but shift turnout. Photo: Erik Hersman under CC BY 2.0. https://www.flickr.com/photos/whiteafrican/3004595893
  continue reading

169 episodes

Artwork

Interpreting the 2018 Election

The Science of Politics

101 subscribers

published

iconShare
 
Manage episode 221604428 series 1740975
Content provided by Niskanen Center - The Science of Politics and Niskanen Center. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Niskanen Center - The Science of Politics and Niskanen Center or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
What are the implications of the 2018 election results? Julia Azari and Rachel Bitecofer are two political scientists who followed it closely and know how it compares to prior cycles. Azari is an election analyst and party scholar who finds that politicians claim electoral mandates for action based on the results of elections. We talk about early interpretations of 2018 as a referendum on Trump and why we simplify election results with stories. Bitecofer is an election analyst and a forecaster of the 2018 election who finds that demographics and partisanship are now destiny. We talk about why negative partisanship makes election results easier to foresee as partisans choose clear sides but shift turnout. Photo: Erik Hersman under CC BY 2.0. https://www.flickr.com/photos/whiteafrican/3004595893
  continue reading

169 episodes

Todos os episódios

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide