How effective is simulation training in anaesthesia?

BJA: British Journal of Anaesthesia

Content provided by Oxford University Press, Rik Thomas, and Podcast Editor. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Oxford University Press, Rik Thomas, and Podcast Editor or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

10y ago 28:03

MP3•Episode home

Archived series ("Inactive feed" status)

When? This feed was archived on January 25, 2021 21:08 (3y ago). Last successful fetch was on July 08, 2019 01:14 (5y ago)

Why? Inactive feed status. Our servers were unable to retrieve a valid podcast feed for a sustained period.

What now? You might be able to find a more up-to-date version using the search function. This series will no longer be checked for updates. If you believe this to be in error, please check if the publisher's feed link below is valid and contact support to request the feed be restored or if you have any other concerns about this.

As a speciality, anaesthesia has long been a champion of simulation training. But whilst ever increasing numbers of simulation based courses are available, what evidence exists for the proposed advantages of this learning modality? For this podcast Dr Ryan Brydges, an educational academic from the University of Toronto, talks to us about his meta-anaylsis on the topic published in this issue of the BJA. Dr Brydges takes us through the current state of the literature, highlighting the areas and domains where simulation appears to be most useful as an educational tool. Dr Brydges and Dr Thomas discuss outcome metrics, comparators, and explore some of the less intuitive findings with regard to crisis resource management training and high fidelity simulators.

48 episodes

#Science #Medicine #Oxford University Press #Rik Thomas #Editors