Artwork

Content provided by Citizens of Tech. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Citizens of Tech or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Renewable Martian Meat - Citizens of Tech 035

43:01
 
Share
 

Archived series ("Inactive feed" status)

When? This feed was archived on October 21, 2018 02:56 (5+ y ago). Last successful fetch was on August 04, 2018 16:54 (5+ y ago)

Why? Inactive feed status. Our servers were unable to retrieve a valid podcast feed for a sustained period.

What now? You might be able to find a more up-to-date version using the search function. This series will no longer be checked for updates. If you believe this to be in error, please check if the publisher's feed link below is valid and contact support to request the feed be restored or if you have any other concerns about this.

Manage episode 210504843 series 2360609
Content provided by Citizens of Tech. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Citizens of Tech or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

This is Episode 35 of the show! Today we bring you meatless meat for carnivores, getting energy from where the sun don’t shine, eyes in the back of your head, and whether or not humans should go to Mars.

Present

Meat-Eaters, Meet your Non-meat meat!

http://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2016/06/21/482322571/silicon-valley-s-bloody-plant-burger-smells-tastes-and-sizzles-like-meat

    Plant based ground beef alternativeDeveloped by “Impossible Foods”Founded by a Stanford biochemist Patrick BrownThis isn’t a just a pseudo-meat for vegetarians and vegans, eitherTarget market is hardcore carnivoresWe’ve discussed a few times about the amount of water, electricity, and other resources required to meet the global demand for meatThis product requires far less resources, has a drastically shorter time-to-table and should become price competitive in the near future - hopefully even becoming cheaper than the real dealApparently, if the article is to believed, the taste is incredible
      The author noted that it was a bit less flavorful than real beef, but had he not known that it wasn’t meat, he wouldn’t have noticed.
    Looks pink and marbled uncooked, sizzles on the grill/pan, juicy and has real meaty flavorThe flavor secret: Heme
      Heme is an iron-containing molecule in blood that carries oxygenLegumes contain leghemoglobin which could have been used… buuuut…Extracting that is expensive, time consuming and still unearths carbon, which is one of the main goals of finding an alternative product
    Technology to the rescue!
      They took the gene responsible for producing heme from the soybean and added it to yeastNow they can make vats of the magic ingredientOne vat is enough to make 20,000 1/4lb (~110g) patties!!
    It even smells right
      Using gas chromatography mass spectrometryCooked meat gases were analyzedDozens of scents combine to smell like meat, which have been replicated
    VS Beef:
      More proteinLess fatFewer caloriesNo cholesterolNo animals were harmed in the making of this burger (religious & ethical objections quelled)
    They’re not the only game in town: Beyond Meat’s “Beyond Burger” is targeted at very much the same goal.
      Brown calls the “Beyond Burger” a “home run” and sees plenty of room in the market for both of these players - with Beyond Burger targeting grocery stores first and Impossible Foods going for restaurant chains first.

Pearl Auto Retrofits Your Car with a Rearview Camera

http://arstechnica.com/cars/2016/06/a-team-of-ex-apple-engineers-wants-to-improve-your-driving-experience/

    Pearl Auto is a bunch of ex-Apple people, apparently. I hope that means their products look great, are easy to use, and cost a fortune.RearVision claims to be “the backup camera redefined.”ORLY? How do you redefine what is in effect a straightforward service? A camera shows you what’s behind you. Seems straightforward enough.Hard to call this “redefinition.” More like...a little complicated, but well-thought out.
      Mounts to the license plate. There’s a bracket that goes through the screw holes. Then the unit mounts to the bracket. Secure, will be okay for most, but a little yuck for me.Has 2 cameras. One’s a wide angle, one’s a more typical view. Both HD. At least, that’s the way the demos look. Tech notes say one is optimized for daytime, and the other is IR and optimized for night. Also a solar charger.Car adapter plugs into the OBD-II port. Hope you weren’t using it for anything else. So plate camera system to adapter, wirelessly. Adapter to phone app, wirelessly. But it’s more than just a wireless relay sucking power from the OBD port. “Through advanced image processing, it analyzes the video streams to detect obstacles in your path, providing audible alerts and sending visual alerts to your phone.” Seems it offloads some compute of the imaging system in the back.Wireless from there to a phone app, where in the demo you see a split screen. One camera view on top, another on bottom. Or see all from one camera in landscape mode.Comes with a magnetic phone mount.
    Some tech details.
      "Any iPhone® 5 (or newer) with iOS 9 (or newer) OR Select Android™ phones with Bluetooth® 4.0 and Lollipop 5.0 (or newer)"Theft deterrent screw. Because getting those bits is hard.
    $500 to pre-order, shipping in September.

Renewables can’t produce enough off-peak power to meet demand… or can they?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2016/06/21/obamas-advisers-just-dismantled-a-key-myth-about-the-future-of-clean-energy/

    Coal, Gas, and Nuclear are pervasive and reliableWind and Solar are catching up, but in the US there is a persistent idea that they cannot meet more than 15-20% of the grid’s demandThis article argues that this isn’t strictly truePortugal recently ran for several days off 100% wind, solar, and hydro power
      This is obviously a very different use case than the US
    Germany has had incredible market penetration in renewablesCan the US really do that, too?Multi-pronged system
      SolarWindHydro-power bridging the gap - it’s not ubiquitous, but it always generates power, assuming the river hasn’t been dammed or diverted somehow
    About controlling demand and supplyDemand response - grid interactive electronics: water heaters, electric cars are both cited as good candidates for this - we discussMy local utility is starting to experiment with this concept - leveling out the demand by preventing peaks in demand, distributing load intelligently. It’s an opt-in program with 3 tiers:
      Do nothing - I’ll “manage” my demand myselfBe notified - I can manage my demand in response to notificationsUtility control - They control the water heater, etc. remotely.
    I like to imagine having my own solar array that provides all my electricity, but that doesn’t sound feasible for me for at least a few years. Is this a more realistic way to achieve renewable energy? Distributing it and leaving it up to your electric utility provider?

Should humans go to Mars?

http://arstechnica.com/science/2016/06/by-the-time-nasa-reaches-mars-robots-might-be-just-as-capable-as-humans/

http://www.mars-one.com/faq/mission-to-mars/why-should-we-go-to-mars

http://phys.org/news/2015-12-mars-moon.html

http://www.space.com/16903-mars-atmosphere-climate-weather.html

http://www.space.com/24701-how-long-does-it-take-to-get-to-mars.html

    FOR.
      Fulfillment of a fantasy.We humans are curious.Progress - a technological achievement.Earth’s support for humans long-term is in question. (Climate change, rising oceans, etc.)Water under the Martian surface is quite helpful.Because not the moon.
        No atmosphere.Wild temperature fluctuations.No protection from solar radiation.Moon dust would be like “tiny shards of glass.”
      Temperature at the equator can get as warm as 70F at midday. (Although overall, it’s pretty darn cold.)Maybe now people will stop e-mailing me.
    AGAINST.
      A decent chance that the trip will kill you.It’s FAR. 225 million kilometers on average. Closest approach to Earth back in 2003 put it about 56 million Km.We’re bad at efficient propulsion systems.Mars is not terribly hospitable to human life.
        Very little atmosphere - 100 times thinner than that of Earth’s, and made of mostly carbon dioxide with just a smidge of nitrogen.Toxic - salt compound perchlorate in the ground.
      Expensive. Not just going to the moon over a few days. Just getting to Mars would take 6-7 months. And now you have to supply the folks there with supplies, since they aren’t going to land and be self-sufficient.
Content I Like

PBS Space Time - Youtube Channel

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7_gcs09iThXybpVgjHZ_7g

    The history of the Planck constantWhy the universe “needs” dark energyCurved Spacetime in General RelativityEtc.
Today I Learned

Apollo 13 was terrible, Hollywood tripe.

Ron Howard stated that, after the first test preview of the film, one of the comment cards indicated "total disdain"; the audience member had written that it was a "typical Hollywood" ending and that the crew would never have survived.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_13_%28film%29#cite_ref-29

Regolith

“Regolith is a layer of loose, heterogeneous superficial material covering solid rock. It includes dust, soil, broken rock, and other related materials and is present on Earth, the Moon, Mars, some asteroids, and other terrestrial planets and moons.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regolith

  continue reading

73 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 

Archived series ("Inactive feed" status)

When? This feed was archived on October 21, 2018 02:56 (5+ y ago). Last successful fetch was on August 04, 2018 16:54 (5+ y ago)

Why? Inactive feed status. Our servers were unable to retrieve a valid podcast feed for a sustained period.

What now? You might be able to find a more up-to-date version using the search function. This series will no longer be checked for updates. If you believe this to be in error, please check if the publisher's feed link below is valid and contact support to request the feed be restored or if you have any other concerns about this.

Manage episode 210504843 series 2360609
Content provided by Citizens of Tech. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Citizens of Tech or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

This is Episode 35 of the show! Today we bring you meatless meat for carnivores, getting energy from where the sun don’t shine, eyes in the back of your head, and whether or not humans should go to Mars.

Present

Meat-Eaters, Meet your Non-meat meat!

http://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2016/06/21/482322571/silicon-valley-s-bloody-plant-burger-smells-tastes-and-sizzles-like-meat

    Plant based ground beef alternativeDeveloped by “Impossible Foods”Founded by a Stanford biochemist Patrick BrownThis isn’t a just a pseudo-meat for vegetarians and vegans, eitherTarget market is hardcore carnivoresWe’ve discussed a few times about the amount of water, electricity, and other resources required to meet the global demand for meatThis product requires far less resources, has a drastically shorter time-to-table and should become price competitive in the near future - hopefully even becoming cheaper than the real dealApparently, if the article is to believed, the taste is incredible
      The author noted that it was a bit less flavorful than real beef, but had he not known that it wasn’t meat, he wouldn’t have noticed.
    Looks pink and marbled uncooked, sizzles on the grill/pan, juicy and has real meaty flavorThe flavor secret: Heme
      Heme is an iron-containing molecule in blood that carries oxygenLegumes contain leghemoglobin which could have been used… buuuut…Extracting that is expensive, time consuming and still unearths carbon, which is one of the main goals of finding an alternative product
    Technology to the rescue!
      They took the gene responsible for producing heme from the soybean and added it to yeastNow they can make vats of the magic ingredientOne vat is enough to make 20,000 1/4lb (~110g) patties!!
    It even smells right
      Using gas chromatography mass spectrometryCooked meat gases were analyzedDozens of scents combine to smell like meat, which have been replicated
    VS Beef:
      More proteinLess fatFewer caloriesNo cholesterolNo animals were harmed in the making of this burger (religious & ethical objections quelled)
    They’re not the only game in town: Beyond Meat’s “Beyond Burger” is targeted at very much the same goal.
      Brown calls the “Beyond Burger” a “home run” and sees plenty of room in the market for both of these players - with Beyond Burger targeting grocery stores first and Impossible Foods going for restaurant chains first.

Pearl Auto Retrofits Your Car with a Rearview Camera

http://arstechnica.com/cars/2016/06/a-team-of-ex-apple-engineers-wants-to-improve-your-driving-experience/

    Pearl Auto is a bunch of ex-Apple people, apparently. I hope that means their products look great, are easy to use, and cost a fortune.RearVision claims to be “the backup camera redefined.”ORLY? How do you redefine what is in effect a straightforward service? A camera shows you what’s behind you. Seems straightforward enough.Hard to call this “redefinition.” More like...a little complicated, but well-thought out.
      Mounts to the license plate. There’s a bracket that goes through the screw holes. Then the unit mounts to the bracket. Secure, will be okay for most, but a little yuck for me.Has 2 cameras. One’s a wide angle, one’s a more typical view. Both HD. At least, that’s the way the demos look. Tech notes say one is optimized for daytime, and the other is IR and optimized for night. Also a solar charger.Car adapter plugs into the OBD-II port. Hope you weren’t using it for anything else. So plate camera system to adapter, wirelessly. Adapter to phone app, wirelessly. But it’s more than just a wireless relay sucking power from the OBD port. “Through advanced image processing, it analyzes the video streams to detect obstacles in your path, providing audible alerts and sending visual alerts to your phone.” Seems it offloads some compute of the imaging system in the back.Wireless from there to a phone app, where in the demo you see a split screen. One camera view on top, another on bottom. Or see all from one camera in landscape mode.Comes with a magnetic phone mount.
    Some tech details.
      "Any iPhone® 5 (or newer) with iOS 9 (or newer) OR Select Android™ phones with Bluetooth® 4.0 and Lollipop 5.0 (or newer)"Theft deterrent screw. Because getting those bits is hard.
    $500 to pre-order, shipping in September.

Renewables can’t produce enough off-peak power to meet demand… or can they?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2016/06/21/obamas-advisers-just-dismantled-a-key-myth-about-the-future-of-clean-energy/

    Coal, Gas, and Nuclear are pervasive and reliableWind and Solar are catching up, but in the US there is a persistent idea that they cannot meet more than 15-20% of the grid’s demandThis article argues that this isn’t strictly truePortugal recently ran for several days off 100% wind, solar, and hydro power
      This is obviously a very different use case than the US
    Germany has had incredible market penetration in renewablesCan the US really do that, too?Multi-pronged system
      SolarWindHydro-power bridging the gap - it’s not ubiquitous, but it always generates power, assuming the river hasn’t been dammed or diverted somehow
    About controlling demand and supplyDemand response - grid interactive electronics: water heaters, electric cars are both cited as good candidates for this - we discussMy local utility is starting to experiment with this concept - leveling out the demand by preventing peaks in demand, distributing load intelligently. It’s an opt-in program with 3 tiers:
      Do nothing - I’ll “manage” my demand myselfBe notified - I can manage my demand in response to notificationsUtility control - They control the water heater, etc. remotely.
    I like to imagine having my own solar array that provides all my electricity, but that doesn’t sound feasible for me for at least a few years. Is this a more realistic way to achieve renewable energy? Distributing it and leaving it up to your electric utility provider?

Should humans go to Mars?

http://arstechnica.com/science/2016/06/by-the-time-nasa-reaches-mars-robots-might-be-just-as-capable-as-humans/

http://www.mars-one.com/faq/mission-to-mars/why-should-we-go-to-mars

http://phys.org/news/2015-12-mars-moon.html

http://www.space.com/16903-mars-atmosphere-climate-weather.html

http://www.space.com/24701-how-long-does-it-take-to-get-to-mars.html

    FOR.
      Fulfillment of a fantasy.We humans are curious.Progress - a technological achievement.Earth’s support for humans long-term is in question. (Climate change, rising oceans, etc.)Water under the Martian surface is quite helpful.Because not the moon.
        No atmosphere.Wild temperature fluctuations.No protection from solar radiation.Moon dust would be like “tiny shards of glass.”
      Temperature at the equator can get as warm as 70F at midday. (Although overall, it’s pretty darn cold.)Maybe now people will stop e-mailing me.
    AGAINST.
      A decent chance that the trip will kill you.It’s FAR. 225 million kilometers on average. Closest approach to Earth back in 2003 put it about 56 million Km.We’re bad at efficient propulsion systems.Mars is not terribly hospitable to human life.
        Very little atmosphere - 100 times thinner than that of Earth’s, and made of mostly carbon dioxide with just a smidge of nitrogen.Toxic - salt compound perchlorate in the ground.
      Expensive. Not just going to the moon over a few days. Just getting to Mars would take 6-7 months. And now you have to supply the folks there with supplies, since they aren’t going to land and be self-sufficient.
Content I Like

PBS Space Time - Youtube Channel

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7_gcs09iThXybpVgjHZ_7g

    The history of the Planck constantWhy the universe “needs” dark energyCurved Spacetime in General RelativityEtc.
Today I Learned

Apollo 13 was terrible, Hollywood tripe.

Ron Howard stated that, after the first test preview of the film, one of the comment cards indicated "total disdain"; the audience member had written that it was a "typical Hollywood" ending and that the crew would never have survived.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_13_%28film%29#cite_ref-29

Regolith

“Regolith is a layer of loose, heterogeneous superficial material covering solid rock. It includes dust, soil, broken rock, and other related materials and is present on Earth, the Moon, Mars, some asteroids, and other terrestrial planets and moons.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regolith

  continue reading

73 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide