PLF Presents Supreme Court Oral Argument in Murr v Wisconsin

Courting Liberty

Content provided by Courting Liberty and Pacific Legal Foundation. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Courting Liberty and Pacific Legal Foundation or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

7y ago 23:40

MP3•Episode home

Archived series ("Inactive feed" status)

When? This feed was archived on June 24, 2021 02:07 (3y ago). Last successful fetch was on July 22, 2020 02:12 (4y ago)

Why? Inactive feed status. Our servers were unable to retrieve a valid podcast feed for a sustained period.

What now? You might be able to find a more up-to-date version using the search function. This series will no longer be checked for updates. If you believe this to be in error, please check if the publisher's feed link below is valid and contact support to request the feed be restored or if you have any other concerns about this.

PLF's D.C. Center Executive Director Todd Gaziano hosts a special, post Supreme Court oral argument round table discussion with PLF's Executive Vice President and General Counsel John Groen, PLF's President and CEO Steven Anderson, and PLF client Donna Murr. On March 20, 2017, the historic property rights case of Murr v. State of Wisconsin and St. Croix County was argued at the Supreme Court. The Murrs would like to sell the vacant parcel, to fund repairs to their family cabin which sits on an adjacent parcel that their parents bought several years earlier. But government officials — imposing regulations enacted after both parcels were purchased — have forbidden them from selling or making any productive use of the vacant investment parcel.

87 episodes

#Politics #Law #Government #Courting Liberty #Pacific Legal Foundation #Directorate of Communications #News