Artwork

Content provided by Sammy Landino and Marko Markolovic. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Sammy Landino and Marko Markolovic or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Episode 2 – Heller And Originalism

39:26
 
Share
 

Manage episode 180022386 series 1447926
Content provided by Sammy Landino and Marko Markolovic. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Sammy Landino and Marko Markolovic or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Judicial methodology and the 2nd amendment are the names of the game for this episode. Join us as we discuss the merits of Originalism through the lens of the Supreme Court case D.C. v. Heller. Notes • At 15:33, "Jefferson" was a misspeak. I meant "Madison". • Facts of the case (Syllabus): https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290.ZS.html • The Opinion of the Court (written by Scalia): https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290.ZO.html • Justice John Paul Stevens' dissent: https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290.ZD.html • Justice Stephen Breyer's dissent: https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290.ZD1.html
  continue reading

4 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 180022386 series 1447926
Content provided by Sammy Landino and Marko Markolovic. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Sammy Landino and Marko Markolovic or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Judicial methodology and the 2nd amendment are the names of the game for this episode. Join us as we discuss the merits of Originalism through the lens of the Supreme Court case D.C. v. Heller. Notes • At 15:33, "Jefferson" was a misspeak. I meant "Madison". • Facts of the case (Syllabus): https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290.ZS.html • The Opinion of the Court (written by Scalia): https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290.ZO.html • Justice John Paul Stevens' dissent: https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290.ZD.html • Justice Stephen Breyer's dissent: https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290.ZD1.html
  continue reading

4 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide