Artwork

Content provided by Oxford University. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Oxford University or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

When the mind matters for morality

1:12:00
 
Share
 

Archived series ("Inactive feed" status)

When? This feed was archived on September 19, 2020 08:07 (3+ y ago). Last successful fetch was on October 04, 2019 01:20 (4+ y ago)

Why? Inactive feed status. Our servers were unable to retrieve a valid podcast feed for a sustained period.

What now? You might be able to find a more up-to-date version using the search function. This series will no longer be checked for updates. If you believe this to be in error, please check if the publisher's feed link below is valid and contact support to request the feed be restored or if you have any other concerns about this.

Manage episode 188170457 series 1575454
Content provided by Oxford University. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Oxford University or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Presentations from an international conference on the normative significance of cognitive science. Hosted by Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford July 2012). In July 2012 the VW Foundation Project 'Intuition and Emotion in Moral Decision-Making: Empirical Research and Normative Implications' held a conference entitled 'Normative Significance of Cognitive Science'. What is the relationship between normative ethics and scientific research on moral judgment and decision-making? What potential is there for drawing ethical implications from such empirical investigations? While questions in this area have received considerable attention lately, the discussion so far has been largely dominated by two opposing scepticisms: scepticism about the relevance of empirical research to ethics, and scepticism about the value of 'traditional' moral theory. This workshop aimed to go beyond such outright scepticism by investigating different ways in which empirical research might impact on normative ethics, focussing on philosophical reflection, whether critical or constructive, rather than on simply showcasing the latest scientific research.
  continue reading

45 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 

Archived series ("Inactive feed" status)

When? This feed was archived on September 19, 2020 08:07 (3+ y ago). Last successful fetch was on October 04, 2019 01:20 (4+ y ago)

Why? Inactive feed status. Our servers were unable to retrieve a valid podcast feed for a sustained period.

What now? You might be able to find a more up-to-date version using the search function. This series will no longer be checked for updates. If you believe this to be in error, please check if the publisher's feed link below is valid and contact support to request the feed be restored or if you have any other concerns about this.

Manage episode 188170457 series 1575454
Content provided by Oxford University. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Oxford University or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Presentations from an international conference on the normative significance of cognitive science. Hosted by Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford July 2012). In July 2012 the VW Foundation Project 'Intuition and Emotion in Moral Decision-Making: Empirical Research and Normative Implications' held a conference entitled 'Normative Significance of Cognitive Science'. What is the relationship between normative ethics and scientific research on moral judgment and decision-making? What potential is there for drawing ethical implications from such empirical investigations? While questions in this area have received considerable attention lately, the discussion so far has been largely dominated by two opposing scepticisms: scepticism about the relevance of empirical research to ethics, and scepticism about the value of 'traditional' moral theory. This workshop aimed to go beyond such outright scepticism by investigating different ways in which empirical research might impact on normative ethics, focussing on philosophical reflection, whether critical or constructive, rather than on simply showcasing the latest scientific research.
  continue reading

45 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide