Artwork

Content provided by Stephen Hammond. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Stephen Hammond or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

May 1, 1996 - Betty-Lu Clara Gibbs

2:04
 
Share
 

Archived series ("HTTP Redirect" status)

Replaced by: Human Rights a Day

When? This feed was archived on May 24, 2017 03:13 (7y ago). Last successful fetch was on May 24, 2017 00:32 (7y ago)

Why? HTTP Redirect status. The feed permanently redirected to another series.

What now? If you were subscribed to this series when it was replaced, you will now be subscribed to the replacement series. This series will no longer be checked for updates. If you believe this to be in error, please check if the publisher's feed link below is valid and contact support to request the feed be restored or if you have any other concerns about this.

Manage episode 178173297 series 40504
Content provided by Stephen Hammond. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Stephen Hammond or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Supreme Court of Canada weighs case to support employees with mental disabilities. Betty-Lu Clara Gibbs was working for Battlefords and District Co-operative Ltd in Saskatchewan in 1987, when she became disabled due to a mental disorder. After her three months of sick leave ran out, a long-term disability plan kicked in. Two years later, however, the benefits portion of that coverage was cut off, thanks to an insurance policy clause that dictated it had to end then if she had no physical disability and was not confined to a mental institution. Gibbs went to the Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission, which ruled that her rights had been violated and ordered her employer to remedy the situation. The company appealed to the courts and lost at both the Saskatchewan Court of Queen’s Bench and Saskatchewan Court of Appeal. On May 1, 1996, the Supreme Court of Canada heard her appeal. Six months later, judges there agreed with the previous rulings that persons with mental disabilities must be given the same rights as those with physical disabilities. The court reiterated the view that human rights legislation in Canada is “fundamental” or “quasi-constitutional,” and therefore must be interpreted in a broad and liberal manner. Hence, the insurance company was ordered to continue covering Gibbs for her long term disability.
  continue reading

391 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 

Archived series ("HTTP Redirect" status)

Replaced by: Human Rights a Day

When? This feed was archived on May 24, 2017 03:13 (7y ago). Last successful fetch was on May 24, 2017 00:32 (7y ago)

Why? HTTP Redirect status. The feed permanently redirected to another series.

What now? If you were subscribed to this series when it was replaced, you will now be subscribed to the replacement series. This series will no longer be checked for updates. If you believe this to be in error, please check if the publisher's feed link below is valid and contact support to request the feed be restored or if you have any other concerns about this.

Manage episode 178173297 series 40504
Content provided by Stephen Hammond. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Stephen Hammond or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Supreme Court of Canada weighs case to support employees with mental disabilities. Betty-Lu Clara Gibbs was working for Battlefords and District Co-operative Ltd in Saskatchewan in 1987, when she became disabled due to a mental disorder. After her three months of sick leave ran out, a long-term disability plan kicked in. Two years later, however, the benefits portion of that coverage was cut off, thanks to an insurance policy clause that dictated it had to end then if she had no physical disability and was not confined to a mental institution. Gibbs went to the Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission, which ruled that her rights had been violated and ordered her employer to remedy the situation. The company appealed to the courts and lost at both the Saskatchewan Court of Queen’s Bench and Saskatchewan Court of Appeal. On May 1, 1996, the Supreme Court of Canada heard her appeal. Six months later, judges there agreed with the previous rulings that persons with mental disabilities must be given the same rights as those with physical disabilities. The court reiterated the view that human rights legislation in Canada is “fundamental” or “quasi-constitutional,” and therefore must be interpreted in a broad and liberal manner. Hence, the insurance company was ordered to continue covering Gibbs for her long term disability.
  continue reading

391 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide