Artwork

Content provided by Reverie. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Reverie or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

The Osmosis Bridging Proposals, featuring Sunny Aggarwal (Osmosis) and Sergey Gorbunov (Axelar)

57:49
 
Share
 

Manage episode 327395566 series 3007314
Content provided by Reverie. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Reverie or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

This week, we chat about Osmosis' unique approach to bridge selection. Unlike other projects which have used many bridges, Osmosis underwent a "canonical bridge selection" process to choose one provider, with the intention of providing a superior UX for end users. All of this was done through on-chain governance. Axelar emerged victorious, and is working on an integration with Osmosis.

In this podcast, we talk about the unique governance process used, the various bridge providers involved, and Axelar's unique approach. Additionally, we talk about Cosmos-based governance systems broadly, and how it differs from those built on Ethereum.

---

Resources:

---

Twitter: @sunnya97 | @sergey_nog |@lsukernik | @derek_hsue

----

Show Notes:

  • How Cosmos-based governance systems compare to Ethereum-based systems
  • The role of validators as hybrid service providers, investors and infrastructure builders
  • Why Osmosis decided to pick one bridge provider to start, as opposed to many
  • The unique design behind the bridge selection proposals
  • Axelar's unique bridging approach to the bridge selection process
  • Why founders should build their own AppChains
  • The broader benefits of modular governance systems

  continue reading

55 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 327395566 series 3007314
Content provided by Reverie. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Reverie or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

This week, we chat about Osmosis' unique approach to bridge selection. Unlike other projects which have used many bridges, Osmosis underwent a "canonical bridge selection" process to choose one provider, with the intention of providing a superior UX for end users. All of this was done through on-chain governance. Axelar emerged victorious, and is working on an integration with Osmosis.

In this podcast, we talk about the unique governance process used, the various bridge providers involved, and Axelar's unique approach. Additionally, we talk about Cosmos-based governance systems broadly, and how it differs from those built on Ethereum.

---

Resources:

---

Twitter: @sunnya97 | @sergey_nog |@lsukernik | @derek_hsue

----

Show Notes:

  • How Cosmos-based governance systems compare to Ethereum-based systems
  • The role of validators as hybrid service providers, investors and infrastructure builders
  • Why Osmosis decided to pick one bridge provider to start, as opposed to many
  • The unique design behind the bridge selection proposals
  • Axelar's unique bridging approach to the bridge selection process
  • Why founders should build their own AppChains
  • The broader benefits of modular governance systems

  continue reading

55 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide