The Moneycontrol Podcast is your daily source of business news, investment analysis and advice on stocks and the markets. Tune in to broaden your horizons with podcasts by journalists, experts and analysts giving you a head-start in the investment game.
Manage episode 212918932 series 1770598
By [i3] Podcast. Discovered by Player FM and our community — copyright is owned by the publisher, not Player FM, and audio is streamed directly from their servers. Hit the Subscribe button to track updates in Player FM, or paste the feed URL into other podcast apps.
Australia is unique in the sense that pension funds pay tax on their investment earnings. Yet few funds look at how they can maximise after-tax outcomes. MarketFox columnist Daniel Grioli speaks with Raewyn Williams, Managing Director of Research at Parametric, why it is important to give this area the attention it deserves and also addresses a few taxation myths, including the tax efficiency of passive investing and the role of it in the take-up of exchange traded funds. Overview: 6:00 Funds find after tax outcomes interesting but are slow to put money behind it. 7:20 Capital gains tax 8:00 Australian equities managers sometimes sell a stock a week before the 12 month holding period where capital gains tax outcomes are much better 12:00 How Parametric realised Australian funds pay tax 18:00 Factor investing: investors feel they have to put their neck on the line, because there is no manager to fire. Blame Culture. 20:00 The biggest problem with innovation is not ideas, but resourcing. 22:00 Disadvantages of scale is it is harder to take up new ideas, to be agile 23:00 Smaller funds should take on board the gift of being more able to take on new ideas 31:00 Passive investing is tax efficient: true or false? 37:00 Should super funds be segregating assets in the pension phase? 44:00 The only innovation in retirement has been flexibility, nothing about income streams. 45:30 ETFs, is there more institutional uptake in US because of tax? 47:30 Loss harvesting in the US through ETFs. 50:00 Centralised portfolio management, does it make sense? 52:30 CGT can’t be managed effectively at the individual manager level. 58:30 Adverse selection risk when looking for managers that share their intellectual property 1:09:00 How do you address concerns that you might use manager IP in centralised portfolio management? Centralised portfolio management is not emulation. 1:14:30 Don’t be obsessed by lowering fees. New expertise comes at a cost.