The Philosophy of Religion Audiobook by J.-M. Kuczynski

1:02:00
 
Share
 

Manage episode 202001083 series 2152347
By Andrew Torres and You Get 1 Full Audiobook Free By Starting a 30-Day Free Trial. Go to *** hotaudiobook.com/free ***. Discovered by Player FM and our community — copyright is owned by the publisher, not Player FM, and audio is streamed directly from their servers. Hit the Subscribe button to track updates in Player FM, or paste the feed URL into other podcast apps.
Listen to this audiobook free with a 30-day trial. Go to http://hotaudiobook.com/free Title: The Philosophy of Religion Subtitle: Philosophy Shorts, Volume 27 Author: J.-M. Kuczynski Narrator: Clive Johnson Format: Unabridged Length: 1 hr and 2 mins Language: English Release date: 08-18-16 Publisher: PHILOSOPHYPEDIA Ratings: 5 of 5 out of 21 votes Genres: Religion & Spirituality, Religious Thought Publisher's Summary: A number attempts to provide a rational basis for religious sentiment are clearly stated and carefully critiqued, most of them being shown to fail. At the same time, it is argued that the legitimacy of religious sentiment is in no way undermined by such failings, since any outlook whose legitimacy depends on the outcome of logical or empirical inquiry is for that very reason a non-religious outlook. And the reason for this is not that a religious outlook is a stubbornly irrational one. It is that the false historical and cosmological doctrines that religions require their followers to accept are mere foils. In believing, for lack of a better word, that Christ walked on water, one is accepting Christ's teachings; one is not actually accepting the obvious falsehood that some man walked on water. Unless one's acceptance of these teachings took the form of quasi-acceptance of obvious fictions, one's acceptance of them would be as fragile and as motivationally inert as any other reason-based belief. By the same token, because the falsehood in question is invariably of a patently infantile kind, one's acceptance of it represents an existential commitment on one's part to a certain way of life. These obvious truths are lost on philosophers of religion, given their tendency to take all statements literally and their consequent failure to give due to weight to unstated contextual information. In general, so the present work demonstrates, philosophers who have examined religion have succeeded only studying projections of their own brittle rationalism, which, it seems, merely cloaks an underlying desire to return to the very pieties these same philosophers claim to spurn. This is not to say that religious belief is not to be analyzed, but rather that it falls within the bailiwick not of the logician, but of the psychoanalyst. Members Reviews: logic meets religion, unique Would you recommend this audiobook to a friend? If so, why? yes, it was objective, in a way that other books on religion are not What other book might you compare The Philosophy of Religion to and why? i can't think of any; it's sui generis What does Clive Johnson bring to the story that you wouldnt experience if you just read the book? He's obviously a great actor. He brings a kind of strength, a quiet discipline to it, underneath which there is pain and wisdom Did you have an extreme reaction to this book? Did it make you laugh or cry? was impressed, sometimes overwhelmed Any additional comments? a bit logic heavy on the whole; k's work is more engaging when he discusses human things than he is doing straight logic, which only goes so far. the most incisive analysis of religion known to me Where does The Philosophy of Religion rank among all the audiobooks youve listened to so far? 2 What other book might you compare The Philosophy of Religion to and why? Kant's book on anthropology What about Clive Johnsons performance did you like? it was perfectly metered; calm but intense. focused but relaxed Was this a book you wanted to listen to all in one sitting? yes Any additional comments? brilliant on everybody's part a truly unique take on religion Would you listen to The Philosophy of Religion again? Why? yes, it was objective but took definite views.

150 episodes