Artwork

Content provided by Opening Arguments Media LLC. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Opening Arguments Media LLC or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

OA129: "Don't Talk To The Police"

1:09:38
 
Share
 

Manage episode 193320381 series 1328385
Content provided by Opening Arguments Media LLC. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Opening Arguments Media LLC or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Should you take legal advice from a viral video on YouTube? Today's episode is all about judges, lawyers, attorney-client privilege, and the police. We begin with the news that Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan has recused herself in the case of Jennings v. Rodriguez; why? After that, the guys break down a video called "Don't Talk To The Police" and discuss some hallmarks of legal videos online. After that, Andrew tackles Donald Trump Jr.'s assertion that whenever a lawyer enters the room, attorney-client privilege shields everything. Is that really true? (No.) Finally, we end with the answer to Thomas Takes The Bar Exam question #53 about witness impeachment. Don't forget to following our Twitter feed (@Openargs) and like our Facebook Page so that you too can play along with #TTTBE! Recent Appearances Andrew was just a guest on Episode 75 of The Science Enthusiast podcast; give it a listen! Show Notes & Links
  1. This is the recusal letter sent on behalf of Justice Kagan; and here is the Code of Conduct for U.S. Judges.
  2. You can watch the "Don't Talk To The Police" video.
  3. Here's the data on Regent University's fake law school.
  4. The first out-of-context quote comes from Watts v. Indiana, 338 U.S. 49 (1949).
  5. The second out-of-context quote comes from Justice Breyer's dissent in Rubin v. U.S., a 1998 cert petition regarding the extent of executive privilege.
Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law Follow us on Twitter: @Openargs Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/openargs/ And email us at openarguments@gmail.com
  continue reading

912 episodes

Artwork

OA129: "Don't Talk To The Police"

Opening Arguments

2,079 subscribers

published

iconShare
 
Manage episode 193320381 series 1328385
Content provided by Opening Arguments Media LLC. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Opening Arguments Media LLC or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Should you take legal advice from a viral video on YouTube? Today's episode is all about judges, lawyers, attorney-client privilege, and the police. We begin with the news that Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan has recused herself in the case of Jennings v. Rodriguez; why? After that, the guys break down a video called "Don't Talk To The Police" and discuss some hallmarks of legal videos online. After that, Andrew tackles Donald Trump Jr.'s assertion that whenever a lawyer enters the room, attorney-client privilege shields everything. Is that really true? (No.) Finally, we end with the answer to Thomas Takes The Bar Exam question #53 about witness impeachment. Don't forget to following our Twitter feed (@Openargs) and like our Facebook Page so that you too can play along with #TTTBE! Recent Appearances Andrew was just a guest on Episode 75 of The Science Enthusiast podcast; give it a listen! Show Notes & Links
  1. This is the recusal letter sent on behalf of Justice Kagan; and here is the Code of Conduct for U.S. Judges.
  2. You can watch the "Don't Talk To The Police" video.
  3. Here's the data on Regent University's fake law school.
  4. The first out-of-context quote comes from Watts v. Indiana, 338 U.S. 49 (1949).
  5. The second out-of-context quote comes from Justice Breyer's dissent in Rubin v. U.S., a 1998 cert petition regarding the extent of executive privilege.
Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law Follow us on Twitter: @Openargs Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/openargs/ And email us at openarguments@gmail.com
  continue reading

912 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide