Dr. Shahzeen Attari on “Reasons for cooperation and defection in real-world social dilemmas”

30:36
 
Share
 

This series is archived ("Inactive feed" status)

Please note series archiving is a new, experimental, feature of Player FM with the aim of helping users understand how we fetch series and report on any issues.

When? This feed was archived on February 12, 2017 15:17 (2y ago). Last successful fetch was on October 12, 2016 16:29 (2y ago)

Why? Inactive feed status. Our servers were unable to retrieve a valid podcast feed for a sustained period.

What now? You might be able to find a more up-to-date version using the search function. This series will no longer be checked for updates. If you believe this to be in error, please check if the publisher's feed link below is valid and contact support to request the feed be restored or if you have any other concerns about this.

Manage episode 159555210 series 96539
By Discovered by Player FM and our community — copyright is owned by the publisher, not Player FM, and audio streamed directly from their servers.

In this episode, I speak with Dr. Shahzeen Attari, who is an Assistant Professor at the School of Public and Environmental Affairs (SPEA) at Indiana University Bloomington. Her research focuses on human behavior and resource use. The focus of the interview was an article published in Judgment and Decision Making , titled “Reasons for cooperation and defection in real-world social dilemmas.” The abstract for the article is provided below for your convenience. To share comments or questions, please share them in the comment section below, or send me a message by going to methodologyforpsychology.org/contact. Thank you for listening.

Mentioned Resources

Science Friday
NPR
Rational Choice in an Uncertain World: The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making
Public perceptions of energy consumption and savings
Perceptions of water use

“Have patience with everything that remains unresolved in your heart.
Try to love the questions themselves,
like locked rooms and books written in a foreign language…
At present you need to live the questions.
Perhaps you will gradually,
without even noticing it,
live your way into the answer.”
Rainer Maria Rilke
Letters to a Young Poet
(1903)

Abstract

“Interventions to increase cooperation in social dilemmas depend on understanding decision makers’ motivations for cooperation or defection. We examined these in five real-world social dilemmas: situations where private interests are at odds with collective ones. An online survey (N = 929) asked respondents whether or not they cooperated in each social dilemma and then elicited both open-ended reports of reasons for their choices and endorsements of a provided list of reasons. The dilemmas chosen were ones that permit individual action rather than voting or advocacy: (1) conserving energy, (2) donating blood, (3) getting a flu vaccination, (4) donating to National Public Radio (NPR), and (5) buying green electricity. Self-reported cooperation is weakly but positively correlated across these dilemmas. Cooperation in each dilemma correlates fairly strongly with self-reported altruism and with punitive attitudes toward defectors. Some strong domain-specific behaviors and beliefs also correlate with cooperation. The strongest example is frequency of listening to NPR, which predicts donation. Socio-demographic variables relate only weakly to cooperation. Respondents who selfreport cooperation usually cite social reasons (including reciprocity) for their choice. Defectors often give self-interest reasons but there are also some domain-specific reasons—some report that they are not eligible to donate blood; some cannot buy green electricity because they do not pay their own electric bills. Cooperators generally report that several of the provided reasons match their actual reasons fairly well, but most defectors endorse none or at most one of the provided reasons for defection. In particular, defectors often view cooperation as costly but do not endorse free riding as a reason for defection. We tentatively conclude that cooperation in these settings is based mostly on pro-social norms and defection on a mixture of self-interest and the possibly motivated perception that situational circumstances prevent cooperation in the given situation.”

The post Dr. Shahzeen Attari on “Reasons for cooperation and defection in real-world social dilemmas” appeared first on The Methodology for Psychology Podcast - Social Psychology - Cognitive Psychology - Experimental Psychology - Psychology of Religion.

52 episodes available. A new episode about every 12 days averaging 36 mins duration .