Artwork

Content provided by Jack Heslin. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Jack Heslin or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Drive to Level 5: Car 2.0: Transportation-as-a-Service

33:14
 
Share
 

Manage episode 311996094 series 3211032
Content provided by Jack Heslin. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Jack Heslin or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

Wrapping up our summer series on autonomous vehicles, our final Drive to Level 5 interview is with Willard Tu, Senior Director of Automotive Technologies at Xilinx.

Willard will be giving his presentation on "Transportation as a Service" at The Drive World Conference in Santa Clara CA on Thursday August 29th. The continuing evolution of autonomous vehicles has enormous implications for all of us. Whether it comes to fruition in five years or ten, this technology will change they way we work, they way we play and essentially how we live.

But how this evolution takes place requires a number of different technologies to continue to develop and come together. Those include :

  • Artificial Intelligence: Computer Vision vs. Neural Nets
    Computer Vision – demands more performance, which drives cost up and thermal dissipation, better suited for FuSa
    Neural Nets – are a true black box, but will likely be lower performance than Computer Vision and lower thermal
  • Compute: Distributed vs. Centralized
    Most of the traditional passenger owned vehicles are driven by costs. These vehicles today are distributed intelligence so that OEMs can source an ECU = 1 function to a supplier. Centralization is much more complex as either the OEM or a Tier 1 has to take on greater responsibility for multiple functions that might be put into a centralized computing center.
    Centralization has trade-offs — you now have to stream a lot of data to a central node this is not easy. Cost is moved from processing at the edge to data transportation across the vehicle
    Robotaxi — vendors are doing it completely differently. They are all for centralization, cost as strong a consideration.
  • Sensing: Camera, Radar, LiDAR
    We will discuss the trade-offs and likely cost projections of each technology.
  • Processing Engines: CPU, DSP, FPGA, GPU
    Will contrast and compare each of these engines.
    Latency: Batch vs. Batch-less will be covered in this comparison.

In this interview Willard takes us through these technologies and discusses the implications autonomous vehicles have for all of us.

  continue reading

6 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 311996094 series 3211032
Content provided by Jack Heslin. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Jack Heslin or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

Wrapping up our summer series on autonomous vehicles, our final Drive to Level 5 interview is with Willard Tu, Senior Director of Automotive Technologies at Xilinx.

Willard will be giving his presentation on "Transportation as a Service" at The Drive World Conference in Santa Clara CA on Thursday August 29th. The continuing evolution of autonomous vehicles has enormous implications for all of us. Whether it comes to fruition in five years or ten, this technology will change they way we work, they way we play and essentially how we live.

But how this evolution takes place requires a number of different technologies to continue to develop and come together. Those include :

  • Artificial Intelligence: Computer Vision vs. Neural Nets
    Computer Vision – demands more performance, which drives cost up and thermal dissipation, better suited for FuSa
    Neural Nets – are a true black box, but will likely be lower performance than Computer Vision and lower thermal
  • Compute: Distributed vs. Centralized
    Most of the traditional passenger owned vehicles are driven by costs. These vehicles today are distributed intelligence so that OEMs can source an ECU = 1 function to a supplier. Centralization is much more complex as either the OEM or a Tier 1 has to take on greater responsibility for multiple functions that might be put into a centralized computing center.
    Centralization has trade-offs — you now have to stream a lot of data to a central node this is not easy. Cost is moved from processing at the edge to data transportation across the vehicle
    Robotaxi — vendors are doing it completely differently. They are all for centralization, cost as strong a consideration.
  • Sensing: Camera, Radar, LiDAR
    We will discuss the trade-offs and likely cost projections of each technology.
  • Processing Engines: CPU, DSP, FPGA, GPU
    Will contrast and compare each of these engines.
    Latency: Batch vs. Batch-less will be covered in this comparison.

In this interview Willard takes us through these technologies and discusses the implications autonomous vehicles have for all of us.

  continue reading

6 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide