Artwork

Content provided by Niskanen Center - The Science of Politics and Niskanen Center. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Niskanen Center - The Science of Politics and Niskanen Center or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

If Moderates are Electable, Why are Ideologues Winning?

49:03
 
Share
 

Manage episode 235432709 series 1740975
Content provided by Niskanen Center - The Science of Politics and Niskanen Center. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Niskanen Center - The Science of Politics and Niskanen Center or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Atop Democratic primary polls, Bernie Sanders and Joe Biden are re-igniting a debate about whether moderates are more electable. Are voters pushing the candidates to the extremes or just looking for moderate alternatives? Andrew Hall finds that moderate candidates are more likely to win general elections, but that they are running for office less often than extremists. The benefits of office are declining and the costs are increasing, especially for potential moderates. But Stephen Utych finds that moderates are far less advantaged in general elections over extremists than they used to be. Partisan polarization means voters increasingly treat politicians in each party as interchangeable, lowering the costs of nominating extremists. Either way, voters are not the main cause of polarization. Studies: "Who Wants to Run" and "Man Bites Blue Dog" Interviews: Andrew Hall, Stanford University; Stephen Utych, Boise State University Photo credit: Gage Skidmore under CC by SA 2.0. https://www.flickr.com/photos/gageskidmore/19197596204
  continue reading

169 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 235432709 series 1740975
Content provided by Niskanen Center - The Science of Politics and Niskanen Center. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Niskanen Center - The Science of Politics and Niskanen Center or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Atop Democratic primary polls, Bernie Sanders and Joe Biden are re-igniting a debate about whether moderates are more electable. Are voters pushing the candidates to the extremes or just looking for moderate alternatives? Andrew Hall finds that moderate candidates are more likely to win general elections, but that they are running for office less often than extremists. The benefits of office are declining and the costs are increasing, especially for potential moderates. But Stephen Utych finds that moderates are far less advantaged in general elections over extremists than they used to be. Partisan polarization means voters increasingly treat politicians in each party as interchangeable, lowering the costs of nominating extremists. Either way, voters are not the main cause of polarization. Studies: "Who Wants to Run" and "Man Bites Blue Dog" Interviews: Andrew Hall, Stanford University; Stephen Utych, Boise State University Photo credit: Gage Skidmore under CC by SA 2.0. https://www.flickr.com/photos/gageskidmore/19197596204
  continue reading

169 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide