Artwork

Content provided by DM Podcasts and Minnimal Productions. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by DM Podcasts and Minnimal Productions or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

S3 E7: Should Academics Be Censured? / Challenging The NSW Vaccination Requirements / Requesting A Matter Be Heard By A Female Magistrate

1:49:46
 
Share
 

Manage episode 308273670 series 2951036
Content provided by DM Podcasts and Minnimal Productions. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by DM Podcasts and Minnimal Productions or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

Celebrating a return to the studio, in this episode The Wigs delve into three diverse topics. First up, the limits of academic freedom as revealed in a recent High Court of Australia decision of Ridd v James Cook University [2021] HCA 32. Should academic freedom be qualified by a requirement to “afford respect and courtesy to others in one’s field of competence”? Should academics be censured, or even lose their jobs, for speaking out, being critical of others, and for attacking university administration and decision-making? Secondly, The Wigs discuss the controversial cases of Kassam v Hazzard; Henry v Hazzard [2021] NSWSC 1320, in which the Plaintiffs brought a whole host of legal challenges to the NSW vaccination requirements, and spoiler, lost all of them. Thirdly, a case about a teenage Aboriginal girl videoed by police whilst being strip searched, and whether her case could be heard by a female Magistrate.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

  continue reading

70 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 308273670 series 2951036
Content provided by DM Podcasts and Minnimal Productions. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by DM Podcasts and Minnimal Productions or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

Celebrating a return to the studio, in this episode The Wigs delve into three diverse topics. First up, the limits of academic freedom as revealed in a recent High Court of Australia decision of Ridd v James Cook University [2021] HCA 32. Should academic freedom be qualified by a requirement to “afford respect and courtesy to others in one’s field of competence”? Should academics be censured, or even lose their jobs, for speaking out, being critical of others, and for attacking university administration and decision-making? Secondly, The Wigs discuss the controversial cases of Kassam v Hazzard; Henry v Hazzard [2021] NSWSC 1320, in which the Plaintiffs brought a whole host of legal challenges to the NSW vaccination requirements, and spoiler, lost all of them. Thirdly, a case about a teenage Aboriginal girl videoed by police whilst being strip searched, and whether her case could be heard by a female Magistrate.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

  continue reading

70 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide