))
The Biggest Advantage in Machine Learning Will Come From Superior Coverage, Not Superior Analysis
Archived series ("Inactive feed" status)
When?
This feed was archived on February 12, 2018 17:19 (
Why? Inactive feed status. Our servers were unable to retrieve a valid podcast feed for a sustained period.
What now? You might be able to find a more up-to-date version using the search function. This series will no longer be checked for updates. If you believe this to be in error, please check if the publisher's feed link below is valid and contact support to request the feed be restored or if you have any other concerns about this.
Manage episode 195262183 series 1538010
Content provided by Daniel Miessler. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Daniel Miessler or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Many people, in many fields, think Machine Learning won't replace their analysts because their humans are better than an algorithm. But it's not just about side-by-side comparisons. The bigger question is, "what percentage of the data can humans actually look at?", and the answer to that question (a tiny fraction) is the reason ML will be so helpful.
100 episodes
Share
