Michael Huemer: Skepticism and Direct Realism | WSB #31

Who Shaves the Barber?

Content provided by William Nava. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by William Nava or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

6y ago 1:00:09

MP3•Episode home

Archived series ("Inactive feed" status)

When? This feed was archived on March 10, 2020 23:07 (4y ago). Last successful fetch was on October 15, 2019 13:05 (4+ y ago)

Why? Inactive feed status. Our servers were unable to retrieve a valid podcast feed for a sustained period.

What now? You might be able to find a more up-to-date version using the search function. This series will no longer be checked for updates. If you believe this to be in error, please check if the publisher's feed link below is valid and contact support to request the feed be restored or if you have any other concerns about this.

Do we have any reason to doubt appearances? And does perception show us intermediary mental representations or real objects themselves?

Michael Huemer's first book, Skepticism and the Veil of Perception, tackles both these questions at once. Huemer is a direct realist: he thinks that when we perceive, we're perceiving reality directly. This contradicts the common philosophical position ("indirect realism") that our perception is of mental objects which are images or representations of real objects to which we have no direct access. The usual challenges against direct realism involve an appeal to illusion and hallucination, though Huemer argues that these are less problematic than is often suggested. Huemer also argues that a direct realism (along with a correct general approach to epistemology) helps refute the famous skeptical arguments: the infinite regress of justification (the "Agrippan trilemma"), the "problem of the criterion", the famous brain in the vat, and Hume's argument against the possibility of induction.

Next week: Michael Huemer: Ethical Intuitionism

Visit http://williamnava.com for more info!

Special thanks to Jackie Blum for the podcast art, and The Tin Box for the theme music.Click here for the full list of episodes!

Sources:Skepticism and the Veil of Perception (Michael Huemer)An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding (David Hume)

Topics discussed:

0:42 - Introduction to Michael Huemer2:15 - Types of skepticism7:10 - Skeptical arguments9:27 - Direct realism and Hume's induction argument12:12 - Perception as foundational belief17:25 - Inferences about experiences?22:02 - Burden of proof23:31 - Radical fallibilism?29:40 - Kinds of appearances30:55 - Problem of criterion and burden shifting34:09 - Is skepticism self-defeating? Provision belief37:24 - Peter Klein's infinitism40:10 - Fallibilism and burden42:17 - Objection from illusion and hallucination44:57 - Direct v. indirect realism: what are representations?50:00 - Brain in the vat53:44 - Mary's room and qualia

55 episodes

#Society #Philosophy #William Nava