Artwork

Content provided by Atheist Community of Austin. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Atheist Community of Austin or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

SCOTUS to Hear Case Regarding Emergency Abortions

18:15
 
Share
 

Manage episode 417207405 series 2246476
Content provided by Atheist Community of Austin. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Atheist Community of Austin or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
‘How sick do they have to get?’ Doctors brace for US supreme court hearing on emergency abortions
The Guardian, By Carter Sherman, on April 23, 2024
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/apr/23/supreme-court-verdict-emergency-abortions-patients-doctors
The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.18.2 featuring Phoebe Rose, Emma Thorne, Infidel64 and Helen Greene
The discussion revolves around the complex interplay between federal and state laws regarding abortion rights in the United States. The Supreme Court is faced with adjudicating between the Biden Administration's stance favoring federal law and Idaho's insistence on prioritizing state law. This clash has significant implications for healthcare, especially concerning emergency room practices and abortion access across the country.
The participants express deep concern and frustration with the situation. They highlight the inadequacy of laws rooted in Christian nationalism and the risks posed to women's health and autonomy. There's a sense of dismay at the disregard for medical expertise and the prioritization of ideological agendas over public health and individual rights.
The conversation delves into legal intricacies, such as the precedence of federal law over state law and the role of the Supreme Court in interpreting and applying these laws. There's criticism of the court's perceived activism and disregard for established legal principles, particularly in recent abortion-related cases.
The discussion also touches on the practical challenges faced by individuals seeking abortion, including financial and logistical barriers, especially for marginalized communities. The participants question the fairness and equity of state laws that restrict access to reproductive healthcare, particularly for those with limited resources.
Overall, the dialogue reflects a sense of frustration with the erosion of abortion rights and the broader implications for healthcare access and individual autonomy in the United States.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
  continue reading

674 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 417207405 series 2246476
Content provided by Atheist Community of Austin. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Atheist Community of Austin or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
‘How sick do they have to get?’ Doctors brace for US supreme court hearing on emergency abortions
The Guardian, By Carter Sherman, on April 23, 2024
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/apr/23/supreme-court-verdict-emergency-abortions-patients-doctors
The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.18.2 featuring Phoebe Rose, Emma Thorne, Infidel64 and Helen Greene
The discussion revolves around the complex interplay between federal and state laws regarding abortion rights in the United States. The Supreme Court is faced with adjudicating between the Biden Administration's stance favoring federal law and Idaho's insistence on prioritizing state law. This clash has significant implications for healthcare, especially concerning emergency room practices and abortion access across the country.
The participants express deep concern and frustration with the situation. They highlight the inadequacy of laws rooted in Christian nationalism and the risks posed to women's health and autonomy. There's a sense of dismay at the disregard for medical expertise and the prioritization of ideological agendas over public health and individual rights.
The conversation delves into legal intricacies, such as the precedence of federal law over state law and the role of the Supreme Court in interpreting and applying these laws. There's criticism of the court's perceived activism and disregard for established legal principles, particularly in recent abortion-related cases.
The discussion also touches on the practical challenges faced by individuals seeking abortion, including financial and logistical barriers, especially for marginalized communities. The participants question the fairness and equity of state laws that restrict access to reproductive healthcare, particularly for those with limited resources.
Overall, the dialogue reflects a sense of frustration with the erosion of abortion rights and the broader implications for healthcare access and individual autonomy in the United States.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
  continue reading

674 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide