Artwork

Content provided by ReproducibiliTea Podcast. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by ReproducibiliTea Podcast or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Episode 31 - Class 2 - What even is a replication?

25:46
 
Share
 

Manage episode 256351702 series 2386163
Content provided by ReproducibiliTea Podcast. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by ReproducibiliTea Podcast or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Episode 31: Class 2 - What even is a replication? It’s week 2 of Amy’s “Psychology as a Robust Science” course and we are discussing replications. What are they? Is there a distinction between direct and conceptual replications? Do direct replications actually exist? Tune in to (maybe) find out! Related papers and links Open Science Collaboration (2015) Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science https://science.sciencemag.org/content/349/6251/aac4716 Nosek and Errington (2017) Making sense of replications https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5245957/ Brian Nosek’s Queensland talk Amy mentioned (roughly between 5:00-15:00): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wsRmyW8GmJs Gilbert, Daniel T., Gary King, Stephen Pettigrew, and Timothy D. Wilson. ‘Comment on “Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science”’. Science 351, no. 6277 (4 March 2016): 1037–1037. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad7243. Anderson, Christopher J., Štěpán Bahník, Michael Barnett-Cowan, Frank A. Bosco, Jesse Chandler, Christopher R. Chartier, Felix Cheung, et al. ‘Response to Comment on “Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science”’. Science 351, no. 6277 (4 March 2016): 1037–1037. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad9163. Bishop, Dorothy V. M. ‘BishopBlog: Sowing Seeds of Doubt: How Gilbert et al’s Critique of the Reproducibility Project Has Played out’. BishopBlog (blog), 27 May 2018. http://deevybee.blogspot.com/2018/05/sowing-seeds-of-doubt-how-gilbert-et.html Music credit: Kevin MacLeod - Funkeriffic freepd.com/misc.php
  continue reading

67 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 256351702 series 2386163
Content provided by ReproducibiliTea Podcast. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by ReproducibiliTea Podcast or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Episode 31: Class 2 - What even is a replication? It’s week 2 of Amy’s “Psychology as a Robust Science” course and we are discussing replications. What are they? Is there a distinction between direct and conceptual replications? Do direct replications actually exist? Tune in to (maybe) find out! Related papers and links Open Science Collaboration (2015) Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science https://science.sciencemag.org/content/349/6251/aac4716 Nosek and Errington (2017) Making sense of replications https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5245957/ Brian Nosek’s Queensland talk Amy mentioned (roughly between 5:00-15:00): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wsRmyW8GmJs Gilbert, Daniel T., Gary King, Stephen Pettigrew, and Timothy D. Wilson. ‘Comment on “Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science”’. Science 351, no. 6277 (4 March 2016): 1037–1037. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad7243. Anderson, Christopher J., Štěpán Bahník, Michael Barnett-Cowan, Frank A. Bosco, Jesse Chandler, Christopher R. Chartier, Felix Cheung, et al. ‘Response to Comment on “Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science”’. Science 351, no. 6277 (4 March 2016): 1037–1037. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad9163. Bishop, Dorothy V. M. ‘BishopBlog: Sowing Seeds of Doubt: How Gilbert et al’s Critique of the Reproducibility Project Has Played out’. BishopBlog (blog), 27 May 2018. http://deevybee.blogspot.com/2018/05/sowing-seeds-of-doubt-how-gilbert-et.html Music credit: Kevin MacLeod - Funkeriffic freepd.com/misc.php
  continue reading

67 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide