))
Interview with Joshua Sealy-Harrington (Part 2): Systemic racism viewed through the lens of historical jurisprudence
Manage episode 319865821 series 3314114
Content provided by Various. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Various or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
In Part 2 of this interview, released in honour of Black History Month, Natalia Rodriguez and Joshua Sealy-Harrington continue their important discussion on systemic racism looking at examples in recent jurisprudence, including;
- R. v. Kokopenace, 2015 SCC 28, in which the Court declined to consider the disproportionate effects of the jury roll system on racialized and marginalized Canadians
- Fraser v. Canada, a recent Supreme Court of Canada decision that provides some helpful language in addressing systemic barriers
- R. v. Chouhan, a Supreme Court of Canada decision on pre-emptory challenges
- They also discuss why there is so little s. 15 jurisprudence relating to race at the highest levels of our courts
Natalia Rodriguez https://conway.pro/natalia-rodriguez
Joshua Sealy-Harrington https://powerlaw.ca/teams/joshua-sealy-harrington/
34 episodes
Share
