))
It’s All in The Fine Print – Are Arbitration Clauses Unconscionable and Do They Apply Retroactively?
Manage episode 320498891 series 3278602
Content provided by Smith Freed Eberhard. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Smith Freed Eberhard or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Welcome to The Briefing - a legal podcast by Smith Freed Eberhard. We will provide insight and analysis on new Oregon and Washington case law, litigation innovation and technology, the insurance marketplace, and firm news.
In this week's episode Partner Gordon Klug discusses Smith Freed Eberhard's latest Legal Alert, "It’s All in The Fine Print – Are Arbitration Clauses Unconscionable and Do They Apply Retroactively?". The Washington Court of Appeals held that the trial court erred in denying a motion to compel arbitration without first having an evidentiary hearing, because the facts were insufficient to support a finding that the arbitration agreement was unconscionable.
25 episodes
Share
