Artwork

Content provided by Paul Townsend. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Paul Townsend or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Wisconsin v. Mark Jensen

53:01
 
Share
 

Manage episode 372230874 series 3383951
Content provided by Paul Townsend. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Paul Townsend or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

Welcome back one and all. In this installment of In Summation - The Final Word, Paul breaks down one of the elements of the 6th Amendment confrontation clause. Generally speaking, a criminal defendant has the right to confront an accuser, or someone producing evidence or testimony against them. This is the basis for the rule against using hearsay at trials.
In our case today, Mark Jensen was accused of murdering his wife, Julie. Julie had become increasingly suspicious of Mark in the time period leading up to her death and had given her neighbors a letter, which she instructed them to give to the police if anything happened to her. When she was found dead, the neighbors gave the police the letter which strongly indicated that law enforcement should investigate Mark should anything happen to her.
Listen to the breakdown of how these issues played out, as several Supreme Court decisions altered the legal landscape while this case was pending.
Additionally, Paul goes into the logistical issues for a prosecutor who has to retry a case 15 years after the initial trial.

  continue reading

59 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 372230874 series 3383951
Content provided by Paul Townsend. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Paul Townsend or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

Welcome back one and all. In this installment of In Summation - The Final Word, Paul breaks down one of the elements of the 6th Amendment confrontation clause. Generally speaking, a criminal defendant has the right to confront an accuser, or someone producing evidence or testimony against them. This is the basis for the rule against using hearsay at trials.
In our case today, Mark Jensen was accused of murdering his wife, Julie. Julie had become increasingly suspicious of Mark in the time period leading up to her death and had given her neighbors a letter, which she instructed them to give to the police if anything happened to her. When she was found dead, the neighbors gave the police the letter which strongly indicated that law enforcement should investigate Mark should anything happen to her.
Listen to the breakdown of how these issues played out, as several Supreme Court decisions altered the legal landscape while this case was pending.
Additionally, Paul goes into the logistical issues for a prosecutor who has to retry a case 15 years after the initial trial.

  continue reading

59 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide