Artwork

Content provided by Brett & Nazim and The Citizens Guide to the Supreme Court. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Brett & Nazim and The Citizens Guide to the Supreme Court or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

50 Shades of Originalism

50:09
 
Share
 

Manage episode 425565316 series 3448839
Content provided by Brett & Nazim and The Citizens Guide to the Supreme Court. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Brett & Nazim and The Citizens Guide to the Supreme Court or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

This week's episode covers two criminal cases with bickering concurrences. Rahimi v. U.S., holding that the Second Amendment does not invalidate a law disarming someone subject to a domestic violence restraining order, shows that a lot can happen in two summers, while Smith v. Arizona, holding that an expert witness cannot testify about a report the expert did not prepare, shows that twenty years is still not enough time to decide what testimonial means. Law starts at (02:22).

  continue reading

424 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 425565316 series 3448839
Content provided by Brett & Nazim and The Citizens Guide to the Supreme Court. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Brett & Nazim and The Citizens Guide to the Supreme Court or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

This week's episode covers two criminal cases with bickering concurrences. Rahimi v. U.S., holding that the Second Amendment does not invalidate a law disarming someone subject to a domestic violence restraining order, shows that a lot can happen in two summers, while Smith v. Arizona, holding that an expert witness cannot testify about a report the expert did not prepare, shows that twenty years is still not enough time to decide what testimonial means. Law starts at (02:22).

  continue reading

424 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide