Nancy Grace dives deep into the day’s most shocking crimes and asks the tough questions in her new daily podcast – Crime Stories with Nancy Grace. Nancy Grace had a perfect conviction record during her decade as a prosecutor and used her TV show to find missing people, fugitives on the run and unseen clues. Now, she will use the power of her huge social media following and the immediacy of the internet to deliver daily bombshells! Theme Music: Audio Network
…
continue reading
Content provided by The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe and True Crime Today. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe and True Crime Today or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!
Go offline with the Player FM app!
Will Mistakes From The Judge In Karen Read Case Prohibit A Re-Trial?
MP3•Episode home
Manage episode 429707987 series 3569233
Content provided by The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe and True Crime Today. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe and True Crime Today or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
In the "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski" podcast episode, Defense Attorney Bob Motta discussed the defense arguments for Karen Read's case. The defense claims that the jury was unanimous on some charges being not guilty, based on affidavits from Alan Jackson and others. Motta emphasized the importance of juror communication and the judge's role in ensuring clarity about whether the jury was deadlocked on all counts. He explained the concept of double jeopardy and how it could impact Read's case if the mistrial was improperly declared. The discussion also covered the procedural nuances and ethical considerations, including the judge's ability to ask specific questions to the jury about their verdicts. Motta highlighted the potential complexities of retrying the case and the significance of preserving objections for appeal. The conversation provided insights into the legal intricacies and potential outcomes of the ongoing trial, underscoring the importance of proper legal procedures and the challenges faced by both the defense and prosecution.
### Main Points
- Defense arguments based on affidavits claiming jury unanimity on some not guilty charges for Karen Read.
- Importance of juror communication and the judge's role in ensuring clarity about the deadlock.
- Discussion of double jeopardy and its implications for Read's case.
- Procedural nuances and the judge's ability to ask specific questions to the jury.
- Potential complexities and challenges of retrying the case.
- Significance of preserving objections for appeal.
- Legal intricacies and potential outcomes of the ongoing trial.
### Hashtags
#KarenRead #AlanJackson #DefenseDiaries #TonyBrueski #DoubleJeopardy #JuryDeliberation #LegalEthics
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
### Main Points
- Defense arguments based on affidavits claiming jury unanimity on some not guilty charges for Karen Read.
- Importance of juror communication and the judge's role in ensuring clarity about the deadlock.
- Discussion of double jeopardy and its implications for Read's case.
- Procedural nuances and the judge's ability to ask specific questions to the jury.
- Potential complexities and challenges of retrying the case.
- Significance of preserving objections for appeal.
- Legal intricacies and potential outcomes of the ongoing trial.
### Hashtags
#KarenRead #AlanJackson #DefenseDiaries #TonyBrueski #DoubleJeopardy #JuryDeliberation #LegalEthics
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
410 episodes
MP3•Episode home
Manage episode 429707987 series 3569233
Content provided by The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe and True Crime Today. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe and True Crime Today or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
In the "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski" podcast episode, Defense Attorney Bob Motta discussed the defense arguments for Karen Read's case. The defense claims that the jury was unanimous on some charges being not guilty, based on affidavits from Alan Jackson and others. Motta emphasized the importance of juror communication and the judge's role in ensuring clarity about whether the jury was deadlocked on all counts. He explained the concept of double jeopardy and how it could impact Read's case if the mistrial was improperly declared. The discussion also covered the procedural nuances and ethical considerations, including the judge's ability to ask specific questions to the jury about their verdicts. Motta highlighted the potential complexities of retrying the case and the significance of preserving objections for appeal. The conversation provided insights into the legal intricacies and potential outcomes of the ongoing trial, underscoring the importance of proper legal procedures and the challenges faced by both the defense and prosecution.
### Main Points
- Defense arguments based on affidavits claiming jury unanimity on some not guilty charges for Karen Read.
- Importance of juror communication and the judge's role in ensuring clarity about the deadlock.
- Discussion of double jeopardy and its implications for Read's case.
- Procedural nuances and the judge's ability to ask specific questions to the jury.
- Potential complexities and challenges of retrying the case.
- Significance of preserving objections for appeal.
- Legal intricacies and potential outcomes of the ongoing trial.
### Hashtags
#KarenRead #AlanJackson #DefenseDiaries #TonyBrueski #DoubleJeopardy #JuryDeliberation #LegalEthics
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
### Main Points
- Defense arguments based on affidavits claiming jury unanimity on some not guilty charges for Karen Read.
- Importance of juror communication and the judge's role in ensuring clarity about the deadlock.
- Discussion of double jeopardy and its implications for Read's case.
- Procedural nuances and the judge's ability to ask specific questions to the jury.
- Potential complexities and challenges of retrying the case.
- Significance of preserving objections for appeal.
- Legal intricacies and potential outcomes of the ongoing trial.
### Hashtags
#KarenRead #AlanJackson #DefenseDiaries #TonyBrueski #DoubleJeopardy #JuryDeliberation #LegalEthics
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
410 episodes
All episodes
×Welcome to Player FM!
Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.