Discrimination Under the Banner of Faith: Analyzing Project 2025's Impact on LGBTQ+ Rights and Religious Freedom

Glass City Humanist

We look into the complex religious dimensions of Project 2025, a strategic initiative shaped by the Heritage Foundation and influenced by various far-right and religious conservative groups. This document serves as a comprehensive playbook for a future conservative presidential administration, detailing policies aimed at reconstituting government to align with a conservative ideology. Building upon our earlier discussions about the dangers posed by Project 2025, we focus specifically on how its religious undertones conflict with our shared humanist principles.

While Project 2025 does not primarily center on religious topics, it does touch upon the concept of religious freedom in a way that allows for discrimination under the guise of protecting sincerely held beliefs. This framework threatens to undermine civil rights protections established by the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which outlaws discrimination based on race, religion, and other criteria in public accommodations. We examine how the authors advocate for policies that would enable private businesses to act on their religious convictions, potentially allowing them to legally refuse service to marginalized individuals, especially in areas such as LGBT rights—issues we previously addressed in another episode.

We then highlight a concept refered to as "communal rest," ostensibly aimed at reinstating Sabbath laws to privilege religious practices over the rights of workers. This proposal seeks to require additional compensation for work performed on Sundays while reinstating historical blue laws that serve a primarily religious purpose. These measures are inconsistent with humanist values, emphasizing the importance of separating religious observance from government regulation.

Moreover, we scrutinize the section of Project 2025 that addresses parental rights within education, particularly in relation to gender identity. The document reflects a profound misunderstanding of how transgender youth navigate their identities and the medical processes involved in transitioning. By leaning into the idea of "parental rights," the authors push back against established medical practices that support trans youth, reflecting a broader effort to delegitimize these identities entirely under regulatory frameworks. We make the case that this poses significant harm to already marginalized groups and raises ethical concerns around informed consent and accessibility to healthcare.

Interspersed throughout our commentary are historical references to the implications of anti-LGBT laws, alongside reflections on how the far-right distorts concepts such as critical race theory and anti-discrimination efforts to paint them as forms of oppression against the majority, rather than protections for vulnerable populations. This misrepresentation is designed to frame institutional racism and support for marginalized communities as threats to the established order, which is not supported by empirical evidence.

We reiterate the urgency of actively engaging with the tenets outlined in Project 2025 and invite listeners to remain vigilant against the encroachment of policies that prioritize religious conservatism over humanist values. It is essential to critically analyze how these proposals will impact our communities and work to ensure a society grounded in compassion, equity, and reason.

Full Show Notes

Subscribe to our Free Newsletter

Check out our Merch