Artwork

Content provided by Ed Zollars. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Ed Zollars or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

The Limits on Taking a Return Position

44:47
 
Share
 

Manage episode 155580383 series 1161335
Content provided by Ed Zollars. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Ed Zollars or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Last year there was lots of discussion regarding the changes to §6694 and how tax professionals were to apply the standards there against return positions. However, while the standard to be applied may have changed, there were standards in place before and this week we look at the case of a CPA that ran afoul of the lower standards. In the case if USA v. Kapp, (2009 TNT 84-30), the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals sustained the issuance of an injunction against a CPA prohibiting him from taking a position on returns that failed the older §6694(a) standard for nondisclosed positions.The case is of interest because the panel gives a practical walkthrough of analyzing the level of support that existed for a position, as well as noting those items of support that Mr. Kapp wished to rely upon but which did not serve to help his cause.The materials for the podcast are at http://www.edzollars.com/2009-05-11_Preparer.pdf .The podcast is sponsored by Leimberg Information Services, located on the web at http://www.leimbergservices.com .
  continue reading

183 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 155580383 series 1161335
Content provided by Ed Zollars. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Ed Zollars or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Last year there was lots of discussion regarding the changes to §6694 and how tax professionals were to apply the standards there against return positions. However, while the standard to be applied may have changed, there were standards in place before and this week we look at the case of a CPA that ran afoul of the lower standards. In the case if USA v. Kapp, (2009 TNT 84-30), the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals sustained the issuance of an injunction against a CPA prohibiting him from taking a position on returns that failed the older §6694(a) standard for nondisclosed positions.The case is of interest because the panel gives a practical walkthrough of analyzing the level of support that existed for a position, as well as noting those items of support that Mr. Kapp wished to rely upon but which did not serve to help his cause.The materials for the podcast are at http://www.edzollars.com/2009-05-11_Preparer.pdf .The podcast is sponsored by Leimberg Information Services, located on the web at http://www.leimbergservices.com .
  continue reading

183 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide