Artwork

Content provided by Niskanen Center - The Science of Politics and Niskanen Center. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Niskanen Center - The Science of Politics and Niskanen Center or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Why Governments Give Away Economic Incentives That Increase Inequality

37:42
 
Share
 

Manage episode 228180762 series 1740975
Content provided by Niskanen Center - The Science of Politics and Niskanen Center. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Niskanen Center - The Science of Politics and Niskanen Center or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Amazon’s headquarters decisions are drawing attention to economic development incentive programs designed to bring businesses and jobs to states and localities, while local opposition in New York drew attention to their role in inequality. Why do states and localities continue to offer them, despite academic research showing they are ineffective? Nathan Jensen finds that voters reward politicians who offer (even unnecessary) incentives, meaning they keep on offering bigger checks. Cynthia Rogers finds that state incentives increase the gaps between the rich and the poor, but they remain an ever-popular tool. Studies: “Incentives to Pander: How Politicians Use Corporate Welfare for Political Gain" and "Income Inequality and Economic Development Incentives in US States.” Interviews: Nathan Jensen, University of Texas and Niskanen Center; Cynthia Rogers, University of Oklahoma Photo Credit: Thierry Ehrmann under CC By 2.0 https://www.flickr.com/photos/home_of_chaos/37909812316
  continue reading

180 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 228180762 series 1740975
Content provided by Niskanen Center - The Science of Politics and Niskanen Center. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Niskanen Center - The Science of Politics and Niskanen Center or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Amazon’s headquarters decisions are drawing attention to economic development incentive programs designed to bring businesses and jobs to states and localities, while local opposition in New York drew attention to their role in inequality. Why do states and localities continue to offer them, despite academic research showing they are ineffective? Nathan Jensen finds that voters reward politicians who offer (even unnecessary) incentives, meaning they keep on offering bigger checks. Cynthia Rogers finds that state incentives increase the gaps between the rich and the poor, but they remain an ever-popular tool. Studies: “Incentives to Pander: How Politicians Use Corporate Welfare for Political Gain" and "Income Inequality and Economic Development Incentives in US States.” Interviews: Nathan Jensen, University of Texas and Niskanen Center; Cynthia Rogers, University of Oklahoma Photo Credit: Thierry Ehrmann under CC By 2.0 https://www.flickr.com/photos/home_of_chaos/37909812316
  continue reading

180 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide