Government Explained Podcast - is here to provide timely, objective analysis, and present understandable non-partisan information for the everyday person. Each Podcast will resolve around a specific topic and only that topic. The goal of this Podcast is take complex government related topics and turned them into something that all can understand. If updates occur in the future regarding a previous episode, then a new episode will be created with "UPDATED" in the title.
…
continue reading
Supreme Court Season episodes will include all arguments that occur from October 01st to June/July.
…
continue reading
1
Trump v. U.S., No. 23-939 [Arg: 4.25.2024]
2:39:18
2:39:18
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
2:39:18
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether and if so to what extent does a former president enjoy presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts during his tenure in office. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★By Austin Songer
…
continue reading
1
Moyle v. U.S., No. 23-726 [Arg: 4.24.2024]
1:53:01
1:53:01
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
1:53:01
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the Supreme Court should stay the order by the U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho enjoining the enforcement of Idaho’s Defense of Life Act, which prohibits abortions unless necessary to save the life of the mother, on the ground that the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act preempts it. ★ Support this pod…
…
continue reading
1
Starbucks Corp. v. McKinney, No. 23-367 [Arg: 4.23.2024]
52:18
52:18
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
52:18
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether courts must evaluate the National Labor Relations Board’s requests for injunctions under Section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act using the traditional, stringent, four-factor test for preliminary injunctions or some other more lenient standard. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
…
continue reading
1
Department of State v. Muñoz, No. 23-334 [Arg: 4.23.2024]
1:31:26
1:31:26
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
1:31:26
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a consular officer's refusal of a visa to a U.S. citizen's noncitizen spouse impinges upon a constitutionally protected interest of the citizen; and whether, assuming that such a constitutional interest exists, notifying a visa applicant that he was deemed inadmissible under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a) (A)(ii) suffices to provide…
…
continue reading
1
Smith v. Spizzirri, No. 22-1218 [Arg: 4.22.2024]
43:17
43:17
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
43:17
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether Section 3 of the Federal Arbitration Act requires district courts to stay a lawsuit pending arbitration, or whether district courts have discretion to dismiss when all claims are subject to arbitration. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★By Austin Songer
…
continue reading
1
City of Grants Pass, Oregon v. Johnson, No. 23-175 [Arg: 4.22.2024]
2:25:58
2:25:58
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
2:25:58
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the enforcement of generally applicable laws regulating camping on public property constitutes “cruel and unusual punishment” prohibited by the Eighth Amendment. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★By Austin Songer
…
continue reading
1
Thornell v. Jones, No. 22-982 [Arg: 4.17.2024]
1:04:36
1:04:36
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
1:04:36
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit violated this court’s precedents by employing a flawed methodology for assessing prejudice under Strickland v. Washington when it disregarded the district court’s factual and credibility findings and excluded evidence in aggravation and the state’s rebuttal when it reversed t…
…
continue reading
1
Fischer v. U.S., No. 23-5572 [Arg: 4.16.2024]
1:40:36
1:40:36
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
1:40:36
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit erred in construing 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c), which prohibits obstruction of congressional inquiries and investigations, to include acts unrelated to investigations and evidence. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★By Austin Songer
…
continue reading
1
Chiaverini v. City of Napoleon, Ohio, No. 23-50 [Arg: 4.15.2024]
58:22
58:22
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
58:22
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether Fourth Amendment malicious-prosecution claims are governed by the charge-specific rule, under which a malicious prosecution claim can proceed as to a baseless criminal charge even if other charges brought alongside the baseless charge are supported by probable cause, or by the “any-crime” rule, under which probable cause…
…
continue reading
1
Snyder v. U.S., No. 23-108 [Arg: 4.15.2024]
1:38:39
1:38:39
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
1:38:39
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether section 18 U.S.C. § 666(a)(1)(B) criminalizes gratuities, i.e., payments in recognition of actions a state or local official has already taken or committed to take, without any quid pro quo agreement to take those actions. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★By Austin Songer
…
continue reading
1
Connelly v. Internal Revenue Service, No. 23-146 [Arg: 3.27.2024]
53:43
53:43
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
53:43
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the proceeds of a life-insurance policy taken out by a closely held corporation on a shareholder in order to facilitate the redemption of the shareholder’s stock should be considered a corporate asset when calculating the value of the shareholder’s shares for purposes of the federal estate tax. ★ Support this podcast on …
…
continue reading
1
Erlinger v. U.S., No. 23-370 [Arg: 3.27.2024]
1:33:07
1:33:07
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
1:33:07
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the Constitution requires a jury trial and proof beyond a reasonable doubt to find that a defendant’s prior convictions were “committed on occasions different from one another,” as is necessary to impose an enhanced sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
…
continue reading
1
Food and Drug Administration v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, No. 23-235 [Arg: 3.26.2024]
1:32:59
1:32:59
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
1:32:59
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether respondents have Article III standing to challenge the Food and Drug Administration’s 2016 and 2021 actions with respect to mifepristone’s approved conditions of use; whether the FDA’s 2016 and 2021 actions were arbitrary and capricious; and whether the district court properly granted preliminary relief. ★ Support this p…
…
continue reading
1
Harrow v. Department of Defense, No. 23-21 [Arg: 3.25.2024]
50:40
50:40
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
50:40
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the 60-day deadline in 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1)(A) for a federal employee to petition the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to review a final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board is jurisdictional. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★By Austin Songer
…
continue reading
1
Becerra v. San Carlos Apache Tribe, No. 23-250 [Arg: 3.25.2024]
1:26:29
1:26:29
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
1:26:29
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the Indian Health Service must pay “contract support costs” not only to support IHS-funded activities, but also to support the tribe’s expenditure of income collected from third parties. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★By Austin Songer
…
continue reading
1
Texas v. New Mexico and Colorado, No. 22O141 [Arg: 3.20.2024]
1:08:41
1:08:41
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
1:08:41
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the court should deny the motion by Texas, New Mexico, and Colorado for entry of a proposed consent decree that would resolve this dispute over the United States' claim as intervenors that New Mexico violated the Rio Grande Compact without the United States’ consent. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
…
continue reading
1
Gonzalez v. Trevino, No. 22-1025 [Arg: 3.20.2024]
1:25:45
1:25:45
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
1:25:45
QUESTION PRESENTED: (1) Whether the probable-cause exception in Nieves v. Barlett can be satisfied by objective evidence other than specific examples of arrests that never happened; and (2) whether Nieves is limited to individual claims against arresting officers for split-second arrests. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
…
continue reading
1
Truck Insurance Exchange v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, No. 22-1079 [Arg: 3.19.2024]
1:12:12
1:12:12
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
1:12:12
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether an insurer with financial responsibility for a bankruptcy claim is a “party in interest” that may object to a plan of reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★By Austin Songer
…
continue reading
1
Diaz v. U.S., No. 23-14 [Arg: 3.19.2024]
1:24:56
1:24:56
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
1:24:56
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether in a prosecution for drug trafficking — where an element of the offense is that the defendant knew she was carrying illegal drugs — Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b) permits a governmental expert witness to testify that most couriers know they are carrying drugs and that drug-trafficking organizations do not entrust large …
…
continue reading
1
National Rifle Association of America v. Vullo, No. 22-842 [Arg: 3.18.2024]
1:14:26
1:14:26
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
1:14:26
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the First Amendment allows a government regulator to threaten regulated entities with adverse regulatory actions if they do business with a controversial speaker, as a consequence of (a) the government’s own hostility to the speaker’s viewpoint or (b) a perceived “general backlash” against the speaker’s advocacy. ★ Suppo…
…
continue reading
1
Murthy v. Missouri, No. 23-411 [Arg: 3.18.2024]
1:42:32
1:42:32
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
1:42:32
QUESTION PRESENTED: (1) Whether respondents have Article III standing; (2) whether the government’s challenged conduct transformed private social media companies’ content-moderation decisions into state action and violated respondents’ First Amendment rights; and (3) whether the terms and breadth of the preliminary injunction are proper. ★ Support …
…
continue reading
1
Coinbase v. Suski, No. 23-3 [Arg: 2.28.2024]
42:57
42:57
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
42:57
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether, where parties enter into an arbitration agreement with a delegation clause, an arbitrator or a court should decide whether that arbitration agreement is narrowed by a later contract that is silent as to arbitration and delegation. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★By Austin Songer
…
continue reading
1
Garland v. Cargill, No. 22-976 [Arg: 2.28.2024]
1:30:26
1:30:26
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
1:30:26
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a bump stock device is a “machinegun” as defined in 26 U.S.C. § 5845(b) because it is designed and intended for use in converting a rifle into a machinegun, i.e., into a weapon that fires “automatically more than one shot ... by a single function of the trigger.” ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
…
continue reading
1
Cantero v. Bank of America, No. 22-529 [Arg: 2.27.2024]
1:47:46
1:47:46
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
1:47:46
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the National Bank Act preempts the application of state escrow-interest laws to national banks. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★By Austin Songer
…
continue reading
1
McIntosh v. U.S., No. 22-7386 [Arg: 2.27.2024]
48:57
48:57
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
48:57
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a district court may enter a criminal-forfeiture order outside the time limitations set forth in Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.2. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★By Austin Songer
…
continue reading
1
NetChoice, LLC v. Paxton, No. 22-555 [Arg: 2.26.2024]
1:20:06
1:20:06
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
1:20:06
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the First Amendment prohibits viewpoint-, content-, or speaker-based laws restricting select websites from engaging in editorial choices about whether, and how, to publish and disseminate speech ‚Äî or otherwise burdening those editorial choices through onerous operational and disclosure requirements. ★ Support this podc…
…
continue reading
1
Moody v. NetChoice, LLC, No. 22-277 [Arg: 2.26.2024]
2:22:31
2:22:31
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
2:22:31
QUESTION PRESENTED: (1) Whether the laws content-moderation restrictions comply with the First Amendment; and (2) whether the laws‚Äô individualized-explanation requirements comply with the First Amendment. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★By Austin Songer
…
continue reading
1
Warner Chappell Music v. Nealy, No. 22-1078 [Arg: 2.21.2024]
53:20
53:20
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
53:20
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether, under the discovery accrual rule applied by the circuit courts and the Copyright Act‚Äôs statute of limitations for civil actions, 17 U.S.C. ¬ß 507(b), a copyright plaintiff can recover damages for acts that allegedly occurred more than three years before the filing of a lawsuit. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
…
continue reading
1
Ohio v. Environmental Protection Agency, No. 23A349 [Arg: 2.21.2024]
1:29:06
1:29:06
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
1:29:06
QUESTION PRESENTED: (1) Whether the court should stay the Environmental Protection Agency‚Äôs federal emission reductions rule, the Good Neighbor Plan; and (2) whether the emissions controls imposed by the rule are reasonable regardless of the number of states subject to the rule. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
…
continue reading
1
Bissonnette v. LePage Bakeries Park St., LLC, No. 23-51 [Arg: 2.20.2024]
1:00:19
1:00:19
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
1:00:19
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether, to be exempt from the Federal Arbitration Act, a class of workers that is actively engaged in interstate transportation must also be employed by a company in the transportation industry. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★By Austin Songer
…
continue reading
1
Trump v. Anderson, No. 23-719 [Arg: 2.8.2024]
2:09:05
2:09:05
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
2:09:05
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the Colorado Supreme Court erred in ordering former President Donald Trump excluded from the 2024 presidential primary ballot. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★By Austin Songer
…
continue reading
1
Relentless v. Department of Commerce, No. 22-1219 [Arg: 1.17.2024]
2:11:44
2:11:44
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
2:11:44
Issue(s): Whether the court should overrule Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, or at least clarify that statutory silence concerning controversial powers expressly but narrowly granted elsewhere in the statute does not constitute an ambiguity requiring deference to the agency. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
…
continue reading
1
Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, No. 22-451 [Arg: 1.17.2024]
1:16:13
1:16:13
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
1:16:13
Issue(s): Whether the court should overrule Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, or at least clarify that statutory silence concerning controversial powers expressly but narrowly granted elsewhere in the statute does not constitute an ambiguity requiring deference to the agency. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
…
continue reading
1
Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. Moab Partners, L.P., No. 22-1165 [Arg: 1.16.2024]
1:05:53
1:05:53
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
1:05:53
Issue(s): Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit erred in holding that a failure to make a disclosure required under Item 303 of SEC Regulation S-K can support a private claim under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, even in the absence of an otherwise misleading statement. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
…
continue reading
1
Devillier v. Texas, No. 22-913 [Arg: 1.16.2024]
1:11:56
1:11:56
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
1:11:56
Issue(s): Whether a person whose property is taken without compensation may seek redress under the self-executing takings clause of the Fifth Amendment even if the legislature has not affirmatively provided them with a cause of action. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★By Austin Songer
…
continue reading
1
Smith v. Arizona, No. 22-899 [Arg: 1.10.2024]
1:28:54
1:28:54
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
1:28:54
Issue(s): Whether the confrontation clause of the Sixth Amendment permits the prosecution in a criminal trial to present testimony by a substitute expert conveying the testimonial statements of a nontestifying forensic analyst, on the grounds that (a) the testifying expert offers some independent opinion and the analyst’s statements are offered not…
…
continue reading
1
Office of the U.S. Trustee v. John Q. Hammons Fall 2006, LLC, No. 22-1238 [Arg: 1.9.2024]
1:02:42
1:02:42
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
1:02:42
Issue(s): Whether the appropriate remedy for the constitutional uniformity violation found by this court in Siegel v. Fitzgerald is to require the United States Trustee to grant retrospective refunds of the increased fees paid by debtors in U.S. Trustee districts during the period of disuniformity, or is instead either to deem sufficient the prospe…
…
continue reading
1
Sheetz v. County of El Dorado, California, No. 22-1074 [Arg: 1.9.2024]
1:28:53
1:28:53
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
1:28:53
Issue(s): Whether a building-permit exaction is exempt from the unconstitutional-conditions doctrine as applied in Nollan v. California Coastal Commission and Dolan v. City of Tigard, Oregon simply because it is authorized by legislation. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★By Austin Songer
…
continue reading
1
Federal Bureau of Investigation v. Fikre, No. 22-1178 [Arg: 1.8.2024]
1:21:49
1:21:49
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
1:21:49
Issue(s): Whether respondent’s claims challenging his placement on the No Fly List are moot given that he was removed from the No Fly List in 2016 and the government provided a sworn declaration stating that he “will not be placed on the No Fly List in the future based on the currently available information. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
…
continue reading
1
Campos-Chaves v. Garland, No. 22-674 [Arg: 1.8.2024]
1:28:53
1:28:53
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
1:28:53
Issue(s): Whether the government provides notice “required under” and “in accordance with paragraph (1) or (2) of” 8 U.S.C. § 1229(a) when it serves an initial notice document that does not include the “time and place” of proceedings followed by an additional document containing that information, such that an immigration court must enter a removal …
…
continue reading
1
Muldrow v. City of St. Louis, Missouri, No. 22-193 [Arg: 12.6.2023]
1:36:42
1:36:42
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
1:36:42
QUESTION PRESENTED: Issue(s): Whether Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination in transfer decisions absent a separate court determination that the transfer decision caused a significant disadvantage. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★By Austin Songer
…
continue reading
1
Moore v. U.S., No. 22-800 [Arg: 12.5.2023]
2:04:39
2:04:39
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
2:04:39
QUESTION PRESENTED: Issue(s): Whether the 16th Amendment authorizes Congress to tax unrealized sums without apportionment among the states. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★By Austin Songer
…
continue reading
1
Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P., No. 23-124 [Arg: 12.4.2023]
1:43:35
1:43:35
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
1:43:35
QUESTION PRESENTED: Issue(s): Whether the Bankruptcy Code authorizes a court to approve, as part of a plan of reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, a release that extinguishes claims held by nondebtors against nondebtor third parties, without the claimants’ consent. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
…
continue reading
1
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy, No. 22-859 [Arg: 11.29.2023]
2:16:41
2:16:41
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
2:16:41
QUESTION PRESENTED: Issue(s): (1) Whether statutory provisions that empower the Securities and Exchange Commission to initiate and adjudicate administrative enforcement proceedings seeking civil penalties violate the Seventh Amendment; (2) whether statutory provisions that authorize the SEC to choose to enforce the securities laws through an agency…
…
continue reading
1
Wilkinson v. Garland, No. 22-666 [Arg: 11.28.2023]
1:30:23
1:30:23
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
1:30:23
QUESTION PRESENTED: Issue(s): Whether an agency determination that a given set of established facts does not rise to the statutory standard of “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship” is a mixed question of law and fact reviewable under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D), or whether this determination is a discretionary judgment call unreviewable under S…
…
continue reading
1
McElrath v. Georgia, No. 22-721 [Arg: 11.28.2023]
59:20
59:20
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
59:20
QUESTION PRESENTED: Issue(s): Whether the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment prohibits a second prosecution for a crime of which a defendant was previously acquitted. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★By Austin Songer
…
continue reading
1
Brown v. U.S., No. 22-6389 [Arg: 11.27.2023]
1:24:50
1:24:50
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
1:24:50
QUESTION PRESENTED: Issue(s): Whether the "serious drug offense" definition in the Armed Career Criminal Act incorporates the federal drug schedules that were in effect at the time of the federal firearm offense or the federal drug schedules that were in effect at the time of the prior state drug offense. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★…
…
continue reading
1
Rudisill v. McDonough, No. 22-888 [Arg: 11.8.2023]
1:10:17
1:10:17
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
1:10:17
QUESTION PRESENTED: Issue(s): Whether a veteran who has served two separate and distinct periods of qualifying service under the Montgomery GI Bill and the Post-9/11 GI Bill is entitled to receive a total of 48 months of education benefits as between both programs, without first exhausting the Montgomery benefit in order to obtain the more generous…
…
continue reading
1
U.S. v. Rahimi, No. 22-915 [Arg: 11.7.2023]
1:32:41
1:32:41
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
1:32:41
QUESTION PRESENTED: Issue(s): Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8), which prohibits the possession of firearms by persons subject to domestic-violence restraining orders, violates the Second Amendment on its face. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★By Austin Songer
…
continue reading
1
Department of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Housing Service v. Kirtz, No. 22-846 [Arg: 11.6.2023]
1:18:29
1:18:29
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
1:18:29
QUESTION PRESENTED: Issue(s): Whether the civil-liability provisions of the Fair Credit Reporting Act unequivocally and unambiguously waive the sovereign immunity of the United States. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★By Austin Songer
…
continue reading