Player FM - Internet Radio Done Right
Checked 9M ago
Added three years ago
Content provided by Pippah Getchell. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Pippah Getchell or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!
Go offline with the Player FM app!
What SCOTUS Wrote Us
Mark all (un)played …
Manage series 3392668
Content provided by Pippah Getchell. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Pippah Getchell or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Audio of Supreme Court opinions. Finally. Listen to full-length readings of the most current opinions as they are issued by the Court. Or, browse through a library containing dozens of landmark opinions from the past. Either way, it’s free! A rare find for SCOTUS nerds.
…
continue reading
352 episodes
Mark all (un)played …
Manage series 3392668
Content provided by Pippah Getchell. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Pippah Getchell or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Audio of Supreme Court opinions. Finally. Listen to full-length readings of the most current opinions as they are issued by the Court. Or, browse through a library containing dozens of landmark opinions from the past. Either way, it’s free! A rare find for SCOTUS nerds.
…
continue reading
352 episodes
All episodes
×I hope you will follow me to my Youtube channel where I will continue to offer free access to all 350+ past episodes and audio of future high-profile Supreme Court opinions. www.whatSCOTUSwroteus.com

1 NEW: Bissonnette v. LePage Bakeries | Federal Arbitration Act, Transportation Workers 18:17
18:17
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked18:17
Listen to the unanimous opinion of the Supreme Court in Bissonnette v. LePage Bakeries Park St., LLC . , decided April 12, 2024. Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us wherever you get podcasts.
The unanimous opinion of the Supreme Court in Federal Bureau of Investigation v. Fikre , decided March 19, 2024. Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us wherever you get podcasts.

1 NEW: DeVillier v. Texas | Fifth Amendment Takings Clause 11:38
11:38
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked11:38
The unanimous opinion of the Court in DeVillier v. Texas , decided April 16, 2024. Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us wherever you get podcasts.

1 Live Summary of the Trump Criminal Cases | Palomar College 55:06
55:06
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked55:06
I have something a little different for you today: since I often read documents from the Trump cases on the show, I thought my super nerds might be interested in hearing the audio from a guest lecture I gave last week summarizing the four Trump criminal cases at a Palomar College event held every semester called the Political Economy Days Lecture Series. If you would like to watch a video version, click here.…

1 MacQuarie Infrastructure v. Moab Partners | Securities Exchange Act § 10(b) 15:31
15:31
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked15:31
The unanimous opinion of the Supreme Court in MacQuarie Infrastructure Corporation, et al. v. Moab Partners, L.P., et al. , decided April 12, 2024. The Court is asked whether the Second Circuit erred in holding-in conflict with the Third, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuits- that a failure to make a disclosure required under Item 303 can support a private claim under Section l0(b), even in the absence of an otherwise- misleading statement. Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us wherever you get podcasts.…

1 Part 2: Pulsifer v. United States | Safety-valve Relief, Mandatory Minimum Sentences 30:04
30:04
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked30:04
Part 2 of 2 of the opinion of the Supreme Court in Pulsifer v. United States , decided March 15, 2024. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-340_p86a.pdf A criminal defendant facing a mandatory minimum sentence is eligible for safety-valve relief under 18 U. S. C. §3553(f)(1) only if the defendant satisfies each of the provision’s three conditions. Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us wherever you get podcasts.…

1 Pulsifer v. United States | Safety-valve Relief, Mandatory Minimum Sentences 39:54
39:54
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked39:54
Part 1 of 2 of the opinion of the Supreme Court in Pulsifer v. United States , decided March 15, 2024. A criminal defendant facing a mandatory minimum sentence is eligible for safety-valve relief under 18 U. S. C. §3553(f)(1) only if the defendant satisfies each of the provision’s three conditions. Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us wherever you get podcasts. WhatSCOTUSWroteUs.com…

1 Part 3: Trump v. United States | Brief for the United States 29:36
29:36
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked29:36
Today I'll be reading Special Counsel Jack Smith's Brief for the United States in Donald Trump v. United States (filed April 8, 2024) - the Supreme Court case in which Donald Trump asserts that presidents have absolute criminal immunity. The brief is 49 pages long, so I will be recording it in several segments. If you are interested in listening to the oral arguments in this case, they are scheduled to take place later this month on April 25th at 10 am eastern time. You can listen to the oral arguments as they happen on the Supreme Court website supremecourt.gov. Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us wherever you get podcasts.…

1 Part 2: Trump v. United States | Brief for the United States 23:19
23:19
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked23:19
Today I'll be reading Special Counsel Jack Smith's Brief for the United States in Donald Trump v. United States (filed April 8, 2024) - the Supreme Court case in which Donald Trump asserts that presidents have absolute criminal immunity. If you are interested in listening to the oral arguments in this case, they are scheduled to take place later this month on April 25th at 10 am eastern time. You can listen to the oral arguments as they happen on the Supreme Court website supremecourt.gov. Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us wherever you get podcasts.…

1 Part 1: Trump v. United States | Brief for the United States 32:35
32:35
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked32:35
Today I'll be reading Special Counsel Jack Smith's Brief for the United States in Donald Trump v. United States (filed April 8, 2024) - the Supreme Court case in which Donald Trump asserts that presidents have absolute criminal immunity. The brief is 49 pages long, so I will be recording it in several segments. If you are interested in listening to the oral arguments in this case, they are scheduled to take place later this month on April 25th at 10 am Eastern time. You can listen to the oral arguments as they happen on the supreme court website supremecourt.gov Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us wherever you get podcasts. WhatSCOTUSWroteUs.com…

1 Part 2: U.S. v. Trump | DOJ Response to Judge Cannon's Jury Instructions Order (Documents Case) 20:20
20:20
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked20:20
Listen to Special Counsel Jack Smith's April 2, 2024 filing responding to Judge Cannon's order requiring preliminary proposed jury instructions and verdict forms on counts 1-32. If you need a quick explainer on the Presidential Records Act, check out mine . Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us wherever you get podcasts. WhatSCOTUSWroteUs.com…

1 Part 1: U.S. v. Trump | DOJ Response to Judge Cannon's Jury Instructions Order (Documents Case) 30:00
30:00
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked30:00
Listen to Special Counsel Jack Smith's April 2, 2024 filing responding to Judge Cannon's order requiring preliminary proposed jury instructions and verdict forms on counts 1-32. If you need a quick explainer on the Presidential Records Act, check out mine . Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us wherever you get podcasts. WhatSCOTUSWroteUs.com…

1 Lindke v. Freed | Social Media, Public Officials, First Amendment 33:19
33:19
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked33:19
When does a public official’s social media activity constitute state action subject to the First Amendment? Listen to the unanimous opinion of the Supreme Court in Lindke v. Freed (March 15, 2024) and find out. Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us wherever you get podcasts. WhatSCOTUSWroteUs.com

1 Concurrences, Trump v. Anderson | Colorado Republican Primary Ballot 14:07
14:07
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked14:07
Today I'll be reading both concurring opinions (which read like dissents) in Donald J. Trump v. Norma Anderson et al. , decided March 4, 2024.
Welcome to Player FM!
Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.