Critical Infrastructure

50 Shades of Planning

Building GP surgeries, schools and roads is not just difficult it is so difficult, according to no less of an expert on such matters than the Prime Minister, as to be a reason to not even contemplate growing existing towns and cities.

In introducing recent proposals to put “rocket boosters” under construction in existing built-up areas, Rishi Sunak was quoted in The Times as saying that “We need to build homes in the places where people need and want them. There’s little point trying to force large new estates on our countryside and Green Belt when that is where public resistance to development is strongest and where the GP surgeries, schools and roads don’t exist to support new communities.”

It is not uncommon though to see opinion polls from time to time highlighting that for people who are not supportive of more homes being built, building more or improving existing medical facilities would likely change their minds.

It is equally not uncommon though to see stories in the press from time to time with headlines like ‘we love our homes but we’re crying out for schools and GPs’.

Where is the line to be drawn between what applicants should reasonably be expected to provide as part of making a development acceptable in planning terms, and the access to health and education that citizens should reasonably expect their Government to provide for them?

How effective is the planning system in bringing together all of the actors and agencies that are responsible for the delivery of social infrastructure?

What are the barriers to LPAs spending what the Home Builders Federation reports to be £2.8bn in unspent S106 contributions?

These are questions that Sam Stafford explores with some old friends of the podcast and some new friends of the podcast.

The old friends are Andrew Taylor, Gilian MacInnes and Ben Woolnough. Andrew is Group Planning Director at Vistry Group; Gilian has her own consultancy and acts a trainer and interim manager in the public sector; and Ben is Planning Manager at East Suffolk Council.

The new friends are James Cutting and Isabella Buono. James is Head of Planning at Suffolk County Council and Isabella is a Barrister at Landmark Chambers.

Some accompanying reading.

Public attitudes to house building: findings from the British Social Attitudes survey 2018

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/public-attitudes-to-house-building-findings-from-the-british-social-attitudes-survey-2018

Our 'new town' with 2,500 homes and 1,000 more to come has no GP, the school is full and the closest supermarket is 25 minutes away - but we do have a nuclear fusion centre

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12392593/Our-new-town-nuclear-fusion-centre-no-GP-school-closest-supermarket-cafe-20-minute-walk-away.html

Section 106 agreements and unspent developer contributions in England and Wales report

https://www.hbf.co.uk/news/section-106-report/?pk_campaign=newsletter_6368

A taxing problem: County Councils “desperate” for CIL money to fund infrastructure

https://www.thedeveloper.live/opinion/opinion/a-taxing-problem-county-councils-desperate-for-cil-money-to-fund-infrastructure

Can You Use Section 106 To Buy Drugs (And To Fund Other Public Services)?

https://simonicity.com/2023/02/18/can-you-use-section-106-to-buy-drugs-and-to-fund-other-public-services/

Mind the Funding Gap: The curious case of s.106 contributions funding NHS services

https://imbusiness.passle.net/post/102i43y/mind-the-funding-gap-the-curious-case-of-s-106-contributions-funding-nhs-service

Some accompanying listening.

School by Nirvana

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sp86SkWKRQE