Artwork

Content provided by ALR Senior Tech Editor. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by ALR Senior Tech Editor or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Loper Bright and the Future of Chevron

54:32
 
Share
 

Manage episode 396139924 series 3255046
Content provided by ALR Senior Tech Editor. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by ALR Senior Tech Editor or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

On this Episode of A Hard Look, ALR Senior Technology Editor Bennett J. Nuss interviews Holwell, Shuster & Goldberg Partner Daniel M. Sullivan regarding the controversial Supreme Court case Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, which has the potential to completely overhaul Administrative Law as we know it. The discussion ranges from the critiques and weaknesses of Chevron doctrine, potential constitutional problems with judicial review of agency decisions, and what administrative law may look like after this groundbreaking term.

---

This episode was produced by ALR Technology Editor, Anthony Aviza.
Many thanks to ALR Editor-in-Chief Madison Gestiehr for her help in providing transcription for this episode.

If you have any questions about this episode, the guest, the podcast, or if you would like to propose a topic or guest, please e-mail Bennett Nuss at ALR-Sr-Tech-Editor@wcl.american.edu

Recommended Reading:

Chevron v. NRDC Marbury v. Madison Amicus and Filings for Loper Bright Transcript

  continue reading

44 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 396139924 series 3255046
Content provided by ALR Senior Tech Editor. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by ALR Senior Tech Editor or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

On this Episode of A Hard Look, ALR Senior Technology Editor Bennett J. Nuss interviews Holwell, Shuster & Goldberg Partner Daniel M. Sullivan regarding the controversial Supreme Court case Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, which has the potential to completely overhaul Administrative Law as we know it. The discussion ranges from the critiques and weaknesses of Chevron doctrine, potential constitutional problems with judicial review of agency decisions, and what administrative law may look like after this groundbreaking term.

---

This episode was produced by ALR Technology Editor, Anthony Aviza.
Many thanks to ALR Editor-in-Chief Madison Gestiehr for her help in providing transcription for this episode.

If you have any questions about this episode, the guest, the podcast, or if you would like to propose a topic or guest, please e-mail Bennett Nuss at ALR-Sr-Tech-Editor@wcl.american.edu

Recommended Reading:

Chevron v. NRDC Marbury v. Madison Amicus and Filings for Loper Bright Transcript

  continue reading

44 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide