Artwork

Content provided by Akhil Reed Amar. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Akhil Reed Amar or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Dissenting in Concurrence

1:37:57
 
Share
 

Manage episode 407869325 series 2858733
Content provided by Akhil Reed Amar. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Akhil Reed Amar or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

The Trump v. Anderson lead balloon continues to smolder. This episode looks at the areas wherein the concurring Justices took issue with the per curiam, and they are many. Indeed, the three Justices who concurred only in the judgment disagree with the scope of the per curiam as well as its particulars, and their concurrence reads more like a dissent. Can we find areas of agreement with ourselves and the concurrences? What can we learn from all this? CLE credit is available from podcast.njsba.com.

  continue reading

186 episodes

Artwork

Dissenting in Concurrence

Amarica's Constitution

59 subscribers

published

iconShare
 
Manage episode 407869325 series 2858733
Content provided by Akhil Reed Amar. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Akhil Reed Amar or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

The Trump v. Anderson lead balloon continues to smolder. This episode looks at the areas wherein the concurring Justices took issue with the per curiam, and they are many. Indeed, the three Justices who concurred only in the judgment disagree with the scope of the per curiam as well as its particulars, and their concurrence reads more like a dissent. Can we find areas of agreement with ourselves and the concurrences? What can we learn from all this? CLE credit is available from podcast.njsba.com.

  continue reading

186 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide