The Jacaranda FM News team is based in Gauteng – but covers local and international news of the day, providing the latest developments online and on-air. News bulletins run from 5am to 7pm weekdays, and from 7am to 6pm on weekends and public holidays. Tune into Jacaranda FM, or log on to www.jacarandafm.com, for the news you need to know.. now.
…
continue reading
Content provided by Bobby Capucci. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Bobby Capucci or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!
Go offline with the Player FM app!
The Opinion And Order Denying El Chapo's Motion For Appeal (Part 3) (8/3/24)
MP3•Episode home
Manage episode 432307848 series 2987886
Content provided by Bobby Capucci. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Bobby Capucci or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Case Overview:
Joaquin Guzman, also known as "El Chapo," appealed his convictions on multiple charges, including engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise and other drug-related offenses. Guzman raised several issues on appeal, challenging the fairness of his trial and the legality of his convictions.
Key Points of the Opinion:
(commercial at 7:31)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
USCOURTS-ca2-19-02239-0.pdf (govinfo.gov)
…
continue reading
Joaquin Guzman, also known as "El Chapo," appealed his convictions on multiple charges, including engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise and other drug-related offenses. Guzman raised several issues on appeal, challenging the fairness of his trial and the legality of his convictions.
Key Points of the Opinion:
- Pretrial Publicity and Jury Impartiality:
- Guzman argued that the extensive pretrial publicity surrounding his case made it impossible to empanel an impartial jury.
- The court found that the trial judge took appropriate measures to ensure jury impartiality, including a thorough voir dire process and instructions to the jury to avoid media coverage.
- Confinement Conditions:
- Guzman contended that his pretrial confinement conditions were excessively harsh and violated his rights.
- The court held that the confinement conditions, while strict, were justified due to Guzman's history of prison escapes and the government's need to ensure security.
- Evidentiary Rulings:
- Guzman challenged several evidentiary rulings made by the trial court, claiming they were prejudicial.
- The appellate court reviewed these rulings and found no abuse of discretion by the trial judge. The evidence was deemed relevant and its probative value outweighed any prejudicial effect.
- Juror Misconduct:
- Guzman alleged juror misconduct, citing claims that jurors had read media reports about the case during the trial.
- The court found no credible evidence of juror misconduct that would warrant a new trial. The trial judge's instructions to the jury and the lack of verified incidents supported this conclusion.
- Sufficiency of the Evidence:
- Guzman argued that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support his convictions.
- The court concluded that the evidence, including testimony from numerous cooperating witnesses and physical evidence, was more than sufficient to support the jury's verdicts.
- Sentencing:
- Guzman also challenged his sentence as being excessively harsh.
- The appellate court affirmed the trial court's sentencing decision, noting the severity of Guzman's crimes and the extensive harm caused by his criminal enterprise.
(commercial at 7:31)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
USCOURTS-ca2-19-02239-0.pdf (govinfo.gov)
1093 episodes
MP3•Episode home
Manage episode 432307848 series 2987886
Content provided by Bobby Capucci. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Bobby Capucci or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Case Overview:
Joaquin Guzman, also known as "El Chapo," appealed his convictions on multiple charges, including engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise and other drug-related offenses. Guzman raised several issues on appeal, challenging the fairness of his trial and the legality of his convictions.
Key Points of the Opinion:
(commercial at 7:31)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
USCOURTS-ca2-19-02239-0.pdf (govinfo.gov)
…
continue reading
Joaquin Guzman, also known as "El Chapo," appealed his convictions on multiple charges, including engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise and other drug-related offenses. Guzman raised several issues on appeal, challenging the fairness of his trial and the legality of his convictions.
Key Points of the Opinion:
- Pretrial Publicity and Jury Impartiality:
- Guzman argued that the extensive pretrial publicity surrounding his case made it impossible to empanel an impartial jury.
- The court found that the trial judge took appropriate measures to ensure jury impartiality, including a thorough voir dire process and instructions to the jury to avoid media coverage.
- Confinement Conditions:
- Guzman contended that his pretrial confinement conditions were excessively harsh and violated his rights.
- The court held that the confinement conditions, while strict, were justified due to Guzman's history of prison escapes and the government's need to ensure security.
- Evidentiary Rulings:
- Guzman challenged several evidentiary rulings made by the trial court, claiming they were prejudicial.
- The appellate court reviewed these rulings and found no abuse of discretion by the trial judge. The evidence was deemed relevant and its probative value outweighed any prejudicial effect.
- Juror Misconduct:
- Guzman alleged juror misconduct, citing claims that jurors had read media reports about the case during the trial.
- The court found no credible evidence of juror misconduct that would warrant a new trial. The trial judge's instructions to the jury and the lack of verified incidents supported this conclusion.
- Sufficiency of the Evidence:
- Guzman argued that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support his convictions.
- The court concluded that the evidence, including testimony from numerous cooperating witnesses and physical evidence, was more than sufficient to support the jury's verdicts.
- Sentencing:
- Guzman also challenged his sentence as being excessively harsh.
- The appellate court affirmed the trial court's sentencing decision, noting the severity of Guzman's crimes and the extensive harm caused by his criminal enterprise.
(commercial at 7:31)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
USCOURTS-ca2-19-02239-0.pdf (govinfo.gov)
1093 episodes
All episodes
×Welcome to Player FM!
Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.