Artwork

Content provided by BJC Podcast. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by BJC Podcast or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Ep. 02: Supreme Court case on gov’t funding of religion: Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue

45:59
 
Share
 

Manage episode 254675881 series 1178551
Content provided by BJC Podcast. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by BJC Podcast or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

Why is religion treated differently by our Constitution? In a blockbuster year at the Supreme Court, BJC Executive Director Amanda Tyler and General Counsel Holly Hollman examine one case that could have major implications for religious liberty law. They dig deeper into Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue (starting at 1:50), talk about what people mean when they say “Blaine amendments,” explain the footnote of a previous decision that came up during oral arguments (18:20), and share their predictions for the decision. They also point out the links between this case and other events, including a troubling proposal released by President Trump during his State of the Union address (29:31). In the final segment, Amanda and Holly review how Supreme Court news continues to dominate religious liberty conversations and note how religion is being treated in news about the coronavirus (39:57). See the show notes for more details.

The post Ep. 02: Supreme Court case on gov’t funding of religion: Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue appeared first on BJC.

  continue reading

76 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 254675881 series 1178551
Content provided by BJC Podcast. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by BJC Podcast or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

Why is religion treated differently by our Constitution? In a blockbuster year at the Supreme Court, BJC Executive Director Amanda Tyler and General Counsel Holly Hollman examine one case that could have major implications for religious liberty law. They dig deeper into Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue (starting at 1:50), talk about what people mean when they say “Blaine amendments,” explain the footnote of a previous decision that came up during oral arguments (18:20), and share their predictions for the decision. They also point out the links between this case and other events, including a troubling proposal released by President Trump during his State of the Union address (29:31). In the final segment, Amanda and Holly review how Supreme Court news continues to dominate religious liberty conversations and note how religion is being treated in news about the coronavirus (39:57). See the show notes for more details.

The post Ep. 02: Supreme Court case on gov’t funding of religion: Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue appeared first on BJC.

  continue reading

76 episodes

Alle Folgen

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide