Artwork

Content provided by Borderlines, Steven Meurrens, and Deanna Okun-Nachoff. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Borderlines, Steven Meurrens, and Deanna Okun-Nachoff or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

#82 - Jandu v. Canada, the top work permit Federal Court case of 2022

1:17:15
 
Share
 

Manage episode 362544438 series 1242892
Content provided by Borderlines, Steven Meurrens, and Deanna Okun-Nachoff. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Borderlines, Steven Meurrens, and Deanna Okun-Nachoff or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Jandu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1787, was a decision where the Federal Court quashed several visa refusals and misrepresentation findings for truck drivers. The case raised several interesting issues, including the roles of Service Canada and IRCC in assessing genuineness, and what documentation visa officers can reasonably expect work permit applicants to provide. Rafeena Rashid and Jelena Urosevic were counsel for the refused truck drivers. 3:00The facts of Janndu11:00Conflicts when representing employers and employees. 13:00The lack of communication between Service Canada and IRCC when it comes to work permit applications. 20:00Assessing genuineness. 23:00Unreasonable documentation requests. 28:00Lessons from the case for future work permit applications. 37:00The distinction between a lack of genuineness and a finding of misrepresentation. 54:00What is the line between misrepresentation and lack of genuineness?

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

  continue reading

124 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 362544438 series 1242892
Content provided by Borderlines, Steven Meurrens, and Deanna Okun-Nachoff. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Borderlines, Steven Meurrens, and Deanna Okun-Nachoff or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Jandu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1787, was a decision where the Federal Court quashed several visa refusals and misrepresentation findings for truck drivers. The case raised several interesting issues, including the roles of Service Canada and IRCC in assessing genuineness, and what documentation visa officers can reasonably expect work permit applicants to provide. Rafeena Rashid and Jelena Urosevic were counsel for the refused truck drivers. 3:00The facts of Janndu11:00Conflicts when representing employers and employees. 13:00The lack of communication between Service Canada and IRCC when it comes to work permit applications. 20:00Assessing genuineness. 23:00Unreasonable documentation requests. 28:00Lessons from the case for future work permit applications. 37:00The distinction between a lack of genuineness and a finding of misrepresentation. 54:00What is the line between misrepresentation and lack of genuineness?

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

  continue reading

124 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide