Artwork

Content provided by Borderlines, Steven Meurrens, and Deanna Okun-Nachoff. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Borderlines, Steven Meurrens, and Deanna Okun-Nachoff or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

#87 - Visa Officers and the IAD Ignoring or Disagreeing with Federal Court, with Raj Sharma

53:54
 
Share
 

Manage episode 375587894 series 1242892
Content provided by Borderlines, Steven Meurrens, and Deanna Okun-Nachoff. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Borderlines, Steven Meurrens, and Deanna Okun-Nachoff or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Raj Sharma is an immigration lawyer in Calgary. In Borderlines Podcast Episode 69 we discussed his case Mohammad v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1, in which the Federal Court quashed an Immigration Appeal Division decision, stating that the IAD did not properly give enough weight to the unique contributions that Ms. Mohammad made as a health care worker during COVID-19, and the debt that was owed to her. The IAD disagreed with the Federal Court, and Raj Sharma sought judicial review again. The case, and today's episode, provides an insight into how redetermination works, and the degree of deference that visa officers and the IAD need to show the Federal Court.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

  continue reading

124 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 375587894 series 1242892
Content provided by Borderlines, Steven Meurrens, and Deanna Okun-Nachoff. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Borderlines, Steven Meurrens, and Deanna Okun-Nachoff or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Raj Sharma is an immigration lawyer in Calgary. In Borderlines Podcast Episode 69 we discussed his case Mohammad v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1, in which the Federal Court quashed an Immigration Appeal Division decision, stating that the IAD did not properly give enough weight to the unique contributions that Ms. Mohammad made as a health care worker during COVID-19, and the debt that was owed to her. The IAD disagreed with the Federal Court, and Raj Sharma sought judicial review again. The case, and today's episode, provides an insight into how redetermination works, and the degree of deference that visa officers and the IAD need to show the Federal Court.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

  continue reading

124 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide