Artwork

Content provided by Tiffany Orth and LBMC Information Security. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Tiffany Orth and LBMC Information Security or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Attack Simulation

6:28
 
Share
 

Manage episode 212974287 series 1526526
Content provided by Tiffany Orth and LBMC Information Security. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Tiffany Orth and LBMC Information Security or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

In a previous podcast, we discussed purple-teaming as it compares to a conventional penetration test. Let’s now build on that approach, starting with the differences between attack simulation and conventional penetration tests. The methodology of attack simulation is the assumption that the network or a system will become compromised and the current controls will not prevent the infection.

So, how does attack simulation differ from purple-teaming? With purple-teaming, everyone know what controls are being tested and when. The attack simulation is a bit different, asthe focus is the emulation of a specific attacker group and their methods of obtaining sensitive data. In this podcast, LBMC Information Security’s Bill Dean discusses attack simulation, or what some people label adversary simulation.

  continue reading

67 episodes

Artwork

Attack Simulation

Cybersecurity Sense

89 subscribers

published

iconShare
 
Manage episode 212974287 series 1526526
Content provided by Tiffany Orth and LBMC Information Security. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Tiffany Orth and LBMC Information Security or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

In a previous podcast, we discussed purple-teaming as it compares to a conventional penetration test. Let’s now build on that approach, starting with the differences between attack simulation and conventional penetration tests. The methodology of attack simulation is the assumption that the network or a system will become compromised and the current controls will not prevent the infection.

So, how does attack simulation differ from purple-teaming? With purple-teaming, everyone know what controls are being tested and when. The attack simulation is a bit different, asthe focus is the emulation of a specific attacker group and their methods of obtaining sensitive data. In this podcast, LBMC Information Security’s Bill Dean discusses attack simulation, or what some people label adversary simulation.

  continue reading

67 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide