Artwork

Content provided by Penn State McCourtney Institute for Democracy/The Democracy Group. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Penn State McCourtney Institute for Democracy/The Democracy Group or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

A deep dive on parties and political reform

41:11
 
Share
 

Archived series ("Inactive feed" status)

When? This feed was archived on September 29, 2024 07:18 (6d ago). Last successful fetch was on August 28, 2024 19:33 (1M ago)

Why? Inactive feed status. Our servers were unable to retrieve a valid podcast feed for a sustained period.

What now? You might be able to find a more up-to-date version using the search function. This series will no longer be checked for updates. If you believe this to be in error, please check if the publisher's feed link below is valid and contact support to request the feed be restored or if you have any other concerns about this.

Manage episode 373111905 series 2480934
Content provided by Penn State McCourtney Institute for Democracy/The Democracy Group. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Penn State McCourtney Institute for Democracy/The Democracy Group or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

Americans want electoral reforms so that they can have more choice in elections. Recent surveys show that 20 to 50 percent of Americans are open to a new electoral system, while demand for a third party has crept upward since Gallup began asking in 2003. More Americans now call themselves “independent” than identify with either of the major parties, but what happens when Americans try to reform their way out of a two-party system?

In More Parties or No Parties, Jack Santucci traces the origins and performance of proportional representation in U.S. cities, the reasons for repeal in all but one case, and discusses the implications of this history for current reform movements at the state and national level. In a two-party system, reform requires appealing to the group that wants to “get the parties out of politics” (or, in modern terms, to “reduce polarization”). This leads to ostensibly nonpartisan reform packages, yet party-like formations emerge anyway, as voters and governments need to be organized. However, such reform is not stable and has tended to make voting difficult for everyday people.

This conversation, originally recorded in August 2022, looks back at the history of political reform and current movements like the Forward Party and the adoption of ranked-choice voting in Nevada and other states. As you’ll hear, reform is easy to put into a slogan, but much harder to implement in practice.

More Parties or No Parties

Jack Santucci’s website

  continue reading

131 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 

Archived series ("Inactive feed" status)

When? This feed was archived on September 29, 2024 07:18 (6d ago). Last successful fetch was on August 28, 2024 19:33 (1M ago)

Why? Inactive feed status. Our servers were unable to retrieve a valid podcast feed for a sustained period.

What now? You might be able to find a more up-to-date version using the search function. This series will no longer be checked for updates. If you believe this to be in error, please check if the publisher's feed link below is valid and contact support to request the feed be restored or if you have any other concerns about this.

Manage episode 373111905 series 2480934
Content provided by Penn State McCourtney Institute for Democracy/The Democracy Group. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Penn State McCourtney Institute for Democracy/The Democracy Group or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

Americans want electoral reforms so that they can have more choice in elections. Recent surveys show that 20 to 50 percent of Americans are open to a new electoral system, while demand for a third party has crept upward since Gallup began asking in 2003. More Americans now call themselves “independent” than identify with either of the major parties, but what happens when Americans try to reform their way out of a two-party system?

In More Parties or No Parties, Jack Santucci traces the origins and performance of proportional representation in U.S. cities, the reasons for repeal in all but one case, and discusses the implications of this history for current reform movements at the state and national level. In a two-party system, reform requires appealing to the group that wants to “get the parties out of politics” (or, in modern terms, to “reduce polarization”). This leads to ostensibly nonpartisan reform packages, yet party-like formations emerge anyway, as voters and governments need to be organized. However, such reform is not stable and has tended to make voting difficult for everyday people.

This conversation, originally recorded in August 2022, looks back at the history of political reform and current movements like the Forward Party and the adoption of ranked-choice voting in Nevada and other states. As you’ll hear, reform is easy to put into a slogan, but much harder to implement in practice.

More Parties or No Parties

Jack Santucci’s website

  continue reading

131 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide