Artwork

Content provided by Round Table Group. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Round Table Group or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

At the Round Table with Insurance Expert, Thomas McCloskey

18:39
 
Share
 

Manage episode 386999882 series 2927801
Content provided by Round Table Group. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Round Table Group or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

Thomas McCloskey is a Litigation Consultant for The Insurance Expert Network. He has testified in over two hundred cases and is a sought-after expert for policy interpretations, insurance company operations and standards; and claims handling. Mr. McCloskey is a contributing author to several training materials including tax industry publications and courses and is a certified Chartered Property Casualty Underwriter (CPCU).
In this episode…

Whether a consulting or testifying expert witness, it is crucial to understand the underlying case. When giving testimony, or responding to the engaging attorney’s questions, a solid foundation is crucial. Our guest, insurance expert, Thomas McCloskey notes:

Now both [consulting and testifying expert witness engagements] require me to do the same steps. I need to see the file material. I need to read it, annotate it, internalize it, and be prepared to be asked anything within the four corners of the litigation. So, it is a lot of reading and a lot of note taking. To get prepared I need to know the case as well as, and sometimes better than the attorney.

He continues:

I start [by] first reading all the filings with the court, and I make notes on who's doing what [. . .] Then I look at the proofs that they have submitted to the court to see if I agree or disagree. And the whole time I've got my trusty legal pad next to me with a pen, and I'm writing questions. ‘Who did this?’ ‘Why are we doing that’? ‘Why did you do that?’ That sort of thing [. . .] I have to put myself in the position of actually being in the middle of the litigation.

Our conversation includes bringing in experts early enough, when to leave an engagement, and avoiding “customer golf.”

  continue reading

122 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 386999882 series 2927801
Content provided by Round Table Group. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Round Table Group or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

Thomas McCloskey is a Litigation Consultant for The Insurance Expert Network. He has testified in over two hundred cases and is a sought-after expert for policy interpretations, insurance company operations and standards; and claims handling. Mr. McCloskey is a contributing author to several training materials including tax industry publications and courses and is a certified Chartered Property Casualty Underwriter (CPCU).
In this episode…

Whether a consulting or testifying expert witness, it is crucial to understand the underlying case. When giving testimony, or responding to the engaging attorney’s questions, a solid foundation is crucial. Our guest, insurance expert, Thomas McCloskey notes:

Now both [consulting and testifying expert witness engagements] require me to do the same steps. I need to see the file material. I need to read it, annotate it, internalize it, and be prepared to be asked anything within the four corners of the litigation. So, it is a lot of reading and a lot of note taking. To get prepared I need to know the case as well as, and sometimes better than the attorney.

He continues:

I start [by] first reading all the filings with the court, and I make notes on who's doing what [. . .] Then I look at the proofs that they have submitted to the court to see if I agree or disagree. And the whole time I've got my trusty legal pad next to me with a pen, and I'm writing questions. ‘Who did this?’ ‘Why are we doing that’? ‘Why did you do that?’ That sort of thing [. . .] I have to put myself in the position of actually being in the middle of the litigation.

Our conversation includes bringing in experts early enough, when to leave an engagement, and avoiding “customer golf.”

  continue reading

122 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide