Artwork

Content provided by Discussions On Psychoanalysis, Grégoire Pierre, and Edgard Danielsen. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Discussions On Psychoanalysis, Grégoire Pierre, and Edgard Danielsen or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

#34 On Neutrality & Analysts' beliefs

41:16
 
Share
 

Manage episode 334403363 series 2694327
Content provided by Discussions On Psychoanalysis, Grégoire Pierre, and Edgard Danielsen. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Discussions On Psychoanalysis, Grégoire Pierre, and Edgard Danielsen or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
In this episode, your hosts continue their discussion on different aspects of neutrality in psychoanalysis. After a few general comments, we will address the balance between leaving all doors open and taking a stand, how some themes attract complexity, and when resistances can be at the disservice of both patients and analysts. Thank you for listening. Share with us your comments or questions directly at discussionsonpsychoanalysis@pm.me or on twitter twitter.com/DiscusOnPsycha Facebook www.facebook.com/groups/249668092601494/ SoundCloud @user-296153775 iTunes podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/disc…is/id1454139315 [0:21] Intro [01:48] Some general comments [05:58] Balance btw leaving all doors open and taking a stand [15:45] Some themes attract complexity [25:19] Resistances at the disservice of both patients and analysts [30:26] The weight of public beliefs [36:48] When the discussion becomes too concrete [39:35] Ending
  continue reading

50 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 334403363 series 2694327
Content provided by Discussions On Psychoanalysis, Grégoire Pierre, and Edgard Danielsen. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Discussions On Psychoanalysis, Grégoire Pierre, and Edgard Danielsen or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
In this episode, your hosts continue their discussion on different aspects of neutrality in psychoanalysis. After a few general comments, we will address the balance between leaving all doors open and taking a stand, how some themes attract complexity, and when resistances can be at the disservice of both patients and analysts. Thank you for listening. Share with us your comments or questions directly at discussionsonpsychoanalysis@pm.me or on twitter twitter.com/DiscusOnPsycha Facebook www.facebook.com/groups/249668092601494/ SoundCloud @user-296153775 iTunes podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/disc…is/id1454139315 [0:21] Intro [01:48] Some general comments [05:58] Balance btw leaving all doors open and taking a stand [15:45] Some themes attract complexity [25:19] Resistances at the disservice of both patients and analysts [30:26] The weight of public beliefs [36:48] When the discussion becomes too concrete [39:35] Ending
  continue reading

50 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide