Artwork

Content provided by Will Baude & Dan Epps, Will Baude, and Dan Epps. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Will Baude & Dan Epps, Will Baude, and Dan Epps or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Libertarian Legal Morality Tales

1:12:16
 
Share
 

Manage episode 430792740 series 2930604
Content provided by Will Baude & Dan Epps, Will Baude, and Dan Epps. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Will Baude & Dan Epps, Will Baude, and Dan Epps or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

As the dust settles on the end of the term, we look back to examine two of the Court's criminal procedure cases: Smith v. Arizona (applying the Confrontation Clause to expert testimony) and Diaz v. United States (interpreting Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b)) after a brief discussion of AI, political developments, and judicial robes.

  continue reading

76 episodes

Artwork

Libertarian Legal Morality Tales

Divided Argument

39 subscribers

published

iconShare
 
Manage episode 430792740 series 2930604
Content provided by Will Baude & Dan Epps, Will Baude, and Dan Epps. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Will Baude & Dan Epps, Will Baude, and Dan Epps or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

As the dust settles on the end of the term, we look back to examine two of the Court's criminal procedure cases: Smith v. Arizona (applying the Confrontation Clause to expert testimony) and Diaz v. United States (interpreting Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b)) after a brief discussion of AI, political developments, and judicial robes.

  continue reading

76 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide