Artwork

Content provided by newDemocracy Foundation and NewDemocracy Foundation. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by newDemocracy Foundation and NewDemocracy Foundation or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Episode 6 Democratic Theory and the British Columbia Citizens' Assembly with Mark Warren

21:02
 
Share
 

Manage episode 279440006 series 2816253
Content provided by newDemocracy Foundation and NewDemocracy Foundation. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by newDemocracy Foundation and NewDemocracy Foundation or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

Mark Warren is a political scientist based in North America whose original interest in democracy theory broadened to encompass deliberative democracy when he studied the British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly in 2004.

Mark’s analysis of that case study and all that followed has been extremely influential in the field.

In this conversation, Mark wonders aloud about the resistance to using deliberative methods on the part of politicians even though bureaucrats are increasingly seeing their advantages, i.e. to help them do their job better.

He cautions deliberative designers to pay close attention to a clear remit and other design options and advises them against convening a mini-public if the design is flawed.

Mark is interested in the way that public deliberations can help to overcome the current ‘democratic malaise’. He believes that these methods can help citizens to own their democracy and enable them to work together constructively despite their differences.

newDemocracy Foundation R&D Note on Framing the Remit

Music acknowledgement.

  continue reading

47 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 279440006 series 2816253
Content provided by newDemocracy Foundation and NewDemocracy Foundation. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by newDemocracy Foundation and NewDemocracy Foundation or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

Mark Warren is a political scientist based in North America whose original interest in democracy theory broadened to encompass deliberative democracy when he studied the British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly in 2004.

Mark’s analysis of that case study and all that followed has been extremely influential in the field.

In this conversation, Mark wonders aloud about the resistance to using deliberative methods on the part of politicians even though bureaucrats are increasingly seeing their advantages, i.e. to help them do their job better.

He cautions deliberative designers to pay close attention to a clear remit and other design options and advises them against convening a mini-public if the design is flawed.

Mark is interested in the way that public deliberations can help to overcome the current ‘democratic malaise’. He believes that these methods can help citizens to own their democracy and enable them to work together constructively despite their differences.

newDemocracy Foundation R&D Note on Framing the Remit

Music acknowledgement.

  continue reading

47 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide