Artwork

Content provided by Federal News Network | Hubbard Radio. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Federal News Network | Hubbard Radio or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

What the Supreme Court decision overturning Chevron deference means to you

11:06
 
Share
 

Manage episode 426586089 series 2701908
Content provided by Federal News Network | Hubbard Radio. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Federal News Network | Hubbard Radio or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

The Supreme Court last week overturned a 40 year precedent. In a case brought by New England fisherman, the court reversed what's been know as Chevron deference. In the 1984 case, the courts said judges should generally defer to federal agencies when rules they make are reasonable, and the enabling law was ambiguous. Last week's decision reverses that thinking. For what this may mean for agency rulemaking operations, we turn to the chair of the Administrative Conference of the United States, Andy Fois.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

  continue reading

5000 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 426586089 series 2701908
Content provided by Federal News Network | Hubbard Radio. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Federal News Network | Hubbard Radio or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

The Supreme Court last week overturned a 40 year precedent. In a case brought by New England fisherman, the court reversed what's been know as Chevron deference. In the 1984 case, the courts said judges should generally defer to federal agencies when rules they make are reasonable, and the enabling law was ambiguous. Last week's decision reverses that thinking. For what this may mean for agency rulemaking operations, we turn to the chair of the Administrative Conference of the United States, Andy Fois.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

  continue reading

5000 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide