Artwork

Content provided by Nora Markard, Emanuel V. Towfigh, and the other Editors of the German Law Journal, Nora Markard, Emanuel V. Towfigh, and The other Editors of the German Law Journal. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Nora Markard, Emanuel V. Towfigh, and the other Editors of the German Law Journal, Nora Markard, Emanuel V. Towfigh, and The other Editors of the German Law Journal or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

GLJ Short - My Body is my Temple? Comparing Sexual Crimes and Property Crimes in a Human Rights Tradition

6:14
 
Share
 

Manage episode 426620311 series 2908807
Content provided by Nora Markard, Emanuel V. Towfigh, and the other Editors of the German Law Journal, Nora Markard, Emanuel V. Towfigh, and The other Editors of the German Law Journal. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Nora Markard, Emanuel V. Towfigh, and the other Editors of the German Law Journal, Nora Markard, Emanuel V. Towfigh, and The other Editors of the German Law Journal or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
With Otava Piha

Link to the article

[Otava Piha, "My Body Is My Temple? Comparing Sexual Crimes and Property Crimes in a Human Rights Tradition" German Law Journal vol. 25:1 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2023.97)

Table of Contents of Volume 25

Abstract

Abstract: Despite recent criminal law reforms to define rape through the lack of consent, practical questions remain about how to regulate different kinds of violations of sexual autonomy. Many common law scholars have found it eye-opening how much more extensive and easily accepted the protection of property rights is compared to the protection of sexual autonomy. But when the rationale of criminalization resides in human rights, such a comparison is alien; protecting human dignity appears separate from protecting instrumental property rights. Considering rape a subversion of our ownership rights to our bodies (the property model of rape) is rightly regarded as problematic. This article argues that comparing sexual crimes and property crimes is not predicated on the property model but rather on autonomy itself. Comparisons based on autonomy could help resolve practical dilemmas of consent-based rape laws while respecting human dignity and thus be fruitful research pursuits within a human rights tradition.

Submit

Submitting articles or Special Issue proposals to the German Law Journal

  continue reading

Chapters

1. GLJ Short - Introduction (00:00:00)

2. In a nutshell, what is the article about? (00:00:28)

3. What's at stake and why now? (00:02:54)

4. How did you come to research and write about this topic? (00:04:24)

5. Outro (00:05:55)

14 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 426620311 series 2908807
Content provided by Nora Markard, Emanuel V. Towfigh, and the other Editors of the German Law Journal, Nora Markard, Emanuel V. Towfigh, and The other Editors of the German Law Journal. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Nora Markard, Emanuel V. Towfigh, and the other Editors of the German Law Journal, Nora Markard, Emanuel V. Towfigh, and The other Editors of the German Law Journal or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
With Otava Piha

Link to the article

[Otava Piha, "My Body Is My Temple? Comparing Sexual Crimes and Property Crimes in a Human Rights Tradition" German Law Journal vol. 25:1 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2023.97)

Table of Contents of Volume 25

Abstract

Abstract: Despite recent criminal law reforms to define rape through the lack of consent, practical questions remain about how to regulate different kinds of violations of sexual autonomy. Many common law scholars have found it eye-opening how much more extensive and easily accepted the protection of property rights is compared to the protection of sexual autonomy. But when the rationale of criminalization resides in human rights, such a comparison is alien; protecting human dignity appears separate from protecting instrumental property rights. Considering rape a subversion of our ownership rights to our bodies (the property model of rape) is rightly regarded as problematic. This article argues that comparing sexual crimes and property crimes is not predicated on the property model but rather on autonomy itself. Comparisons based on autonomy could help resolve practical dilemmas of consent-based rape laws while respecting human dignity and thus be fruitful research pursuits within a human rights tradition.

Submit

Submitting articles or Special Issue proposals to the German Law Journal

  continue reading

Chapters

1. GLJ Short - Introduction (00:00:00)

2. In a nutshell, what is the article about? (00:00:28)

3. What's at stake and why now? (00:02:54)

4. How did you come to research and write about this topic? (00:04:24)

5. Outro (00:05:55)

14 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide