Artwork

Content provided by Greg Muller and Supreme Court of Victoria. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Greg Muller and Supreme Court of Victoria or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Episode 7: Terrorism - Part 1

49:47
 
Share
 

Manage episode 294352424 series 2495988
Content provided by Greg Muller and Supreme Court of Victoria. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Greg Muller and Supreme Court of Victoria or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

Terrorism cases are among the most high-profile offences to come to the Supreme Court. The trials are complicated and usually long, as are the resulting sentences. The cases attract a lot of public interest. On the day of a sentence, the public galleries and press seats will be full, and TV cameras, lights and journos will be set up outside the Court to film what they can.

Only a few terrorism trials have been heard in Australia, and in this episode we look closely at two of them. This episode of Gertie’s Law details what terrorist offences are, and what happens when they come before a judge of the Supreme Court.

Links to cases discussed in this episode.

The Queen v Shoma

The Queen v Mohamed, Chaarani & Moukhaibe

Court of Appeal

Chaarani & Ors v The Queen

High Court

Chaarani v The Queen; Moukhaiber v The Queen

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

  continue reading

Chapters

1. prep comments (00:11:18)

2. NIck Robertson (00:18:31)

3. New Zealand (00:24:17)

4. Shoma (00:29:07)

5. Chaarani (00:37:59)

6. Closing (00:48:38)

25 episodes

Artwork

Episode 7: Terrorism - Part 1

Gertie's Law

75 subscribers

published

iconShare
 
Manage episode 294352424 series 2495988
Content provided by Greg Muller and Supreme Court of Victoria. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Greg Muller and Supreme Court of Victoria or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

Terrorism cases are among the most high-profile offences to come to the Supreme Court. The trials are complicated and usually long, as are the resulting sentences. The cases attract a lot of public interest. On the day of a sentence, the public galleries and press seats will be full, and TV cameras, lights and journos will be set up outside the Court to film what they can.

Only a few terrorism trials have been heard in Australia, and in this episode we look closely at two of them. This episode of Gertie’s Law details what terrorist offences are, and what happens when they come before a judge of the Supreme Court.

Links to cases discussed in this episode.

The Queen v Shoma

The Queen v Mohamed, Chaarani & Moukhaibe

Court of Appeal

Chaarani & Ors v The Queen

High Court

Chaarani v The Queen; Moukhaiber v The Queen

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

  continue reading

Chapters

1. prep comments (00:11:18)

2. NIck Robertson (00:18:31)

3. New Zealand (00:24:17)

4. Shoma (00:29:07)

5. Chaarani (00:37:59)

6. Closing (00:48:38)

25 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide