Artwork

Content provided by Fin Moorhouse and Luca Righetti, Fin Moorhouse, and Luca Righetti. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Fin Moorhouse and Luca Righetti, Fin Moorhouse, and Luca Righetti or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

#76 – Joe Carlsmith on Scheming AI

1:51:32
 
Share
 

Manage episode 406789446 series 2607952
Content provided by Fin Moorhouse and Luca Righetti, Fin Moorhouse, and Luca Righetti. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Fin Moorhouse and Luca Righetti, Fin Moorhouse, and Luca Righetti or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

Joe Carlsmith is a writer, researcher, and philosopher. He works as a senior research analyst at Open Philanthropy, where he focuses on existential risk from advanced artificial intelligence. He also writes independently about various topics in philosophy and futurism, and holds a doctorate in philosophy from the University of Oxford.

You can find links and a transcript at www.hearthisidea.com/episodes/carlsmith

In this episode we talked about a report Joe recently authored, titled ‘Scheming AIs: Will AIs fake alignment during training in order to get power?’. The report “examines whether advanced AIs that perform well in training will be doing so in order to gain power later”; a behaviour Carlsmith calls scheming.

We talk about:

  • Distinguishing ways AI systems can be deceptive and misaligned
  • Why powerful AI systems might acquire goals that go beyond what they’re trained to do, and how those goals could lead to scheming
  • Why scheming goals might perform better (or worse) in training than less worrying goals
  • The ‘counting argument’ for scheming AI
  • Why goals that lead to scheming might be simpler than the goals we intend
  • Things Joe is still confused about, and research project ideas

You can get in touch through our website or on Twitter. Consider leaving us an honest review wherever you're listening to this — it's the best free way to support the show. Thanks for listening!

  continue reading

83 episodes

Artwork

#76 – Joe Carlsmith on Scheming AI

Hear This Idea

35 subscribers

published

iconShare
 
Manage episode 406789446 series 2607952
Content provided by Fin Moorhouse and Luca Righetti, Fin Moorhouse, and Luca Righetti. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Fin Moorhouse and Luca Righetti, Fin Moorhouse, and Luca Righetti or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

Joe Carlsmith is a writer, researcher, and philosopher. He works as a senior research analyst at Open Philanthropy, where he focuses on existential risk from advanced artificial intelligence. He also writes independently about various topics in philosophy and futurism, and holds a doctorate in philosophy from the University of Oxford.

You can find links and a transcript at www.hearthisidea.com/episodes/carlsmith

In this episode we talked about a report Joe recently authored, titled ‘Scheming AIs: Will AIs fake alignment during training in order to get power?’. The report “examines whether advanced AIs that perform well in training will be doing so in order to gain power later”; a behaviour Carlsmith calls scheming.

We talk about:

  • Distinguishing ways AI systems can be deceptive and misaligned
  • Why powerful AI systems might acquire goals that go beyond what they’re trained to do, and how those goals could lead to scheming
  • Why scheming goals might perform better (or worse) in training than less worrying goals
  • The ‘counting argument’ for scheming AI
  • Why goals that lead to scheming might be simpler than the goals we intend
  • Things Joe is still confused about, and research project ideas

You can get in touch through our website or on Twitter. Consider leaving us an honest review wherever you're listening to this — it's the best free way to support the show. Thanks for listening!

  continue reading

83 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide