Artwork

Content provided by Joe Dunman. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Joe Dunman or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Episode 8: Palmer v. Thompson

39:13
 
Share
 

Archived series ("Inactive feed" status)

When? This feed was archived on June 16, 2024 20:08 (3M ago). Last successful fetch was on February 26, 2024 23:42 (7M ago)

Why? Inactive feed status. Our servers were unable to retrieve a valid podcast feed for a sustained period.

What now? You might be able to find a more up-to-date version using the search function. This series will no longer be checked for updates. If you believe this to be in error, please check if the publisher's feed link below is valid and contact support to request the feed be restored or if you have any other concerns about this.

Manage episode 179498381 series 1397330
Content provided by Joe Dunman. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Joe Dunman or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

In 1954, the Supreme Court struck down the Jim Crow doctrine of "separate but equal" in public education. A year later, the Court ruled that all public facilities operated by state and local municipalities must be desegregated as well.

In a subsequent lower court case called Clark v. Thompson, the city of Jackson, Mississippi was ordered to desegregate its parks, its zoo, its golf courses, and its five swimming pools. The city complied with one exception; instead of opening its pools to people of all races, it closed them all down entirely.

A group of local African Americans sued, arguing that the decision to close all the pools - which city leaders admitted was done in response to the integration order - was based on racial animus and in violation the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments. The Supreme Court, in a very close 5-4 vote, disagreed. The social ramifications, if not the legal ones, would be dire.

Questions: Did the closing of public pools to all persons constitute a denial of equal protection of the laws to Negroes under the Fourteenth Amendment? Did the city council's action in closing the pools, instead of keeping them open on an integrated basis, create a "badge or incident" of slavery in violation of the Thirteenth Amendment?

Answers: No and no.

Majority:

  • Hugo Black (majority opinion)
  • Warren Burger (w/ concurrence)
  • John Marshall Harlan
  • Potter Stewart
  • Harry Blackmun (w/ concurrence)

Dissent:

  • William Douglas (w/ opinion)
  • Byron White (w/ opinion)
  • William Brennan
  • Thurgood Marshall (w/ opinion)
  continue reading

13 episodes

Artwork

Episode 8: Palmer v. Thompson

Heightened Scrutiny

11 subscribers

published

iconShare
 

Archived series ("Inactive feed" status)

When? This feed was archived on June 16, 2024 20:08 (3M ago). Last successful fetch was on February 26, 2024 23:42 (7M ago)

Why? Inactive feed status. Our servers were unable to retrieve a valid podcast feed for a sustained period.

What now? You might be able to find a more up-to-date version using the search function. This series will no longer be checked for updates. If you believe this to be in error, please check if the publisher's feed link below is valid and contact support to request the feed be restored or if you have any other concerns about this.

Manage episode 179498381 series 1397330
Content provided by Joe Dunman. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Joe Dunman or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

In 1954, the Supreme Court struck down the Jim Crow doctrine of "separate but equal" in public education. A year later, the Court ruled that all public facilities operated by state and local municipalities must be desegregated as well.

In a subsequent lower court case called Clark v. Thompson, the city of Jackson, Mississippi was ordered to desegregate its parks, its zoo, its golf courses, and its five swimming pools. The city complied with one exception; instead of opening its pools to people of all races, it closed them all down entirely.

A group of local African Americans sued, arguing that the decision to close all the pools - which city leaders admitted was done in response to the integration order - was based on racial animus and in violation the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments. The Supreme Court, in a very close 5-4 vote, disagreed. The social ramifications, if not the legal ones, would be dire.

Questions: Did the closing of public pools to all persons constitute a denial of equal protection of the laws to Negroes under the Fourteenth Amendment? Did the city council's action in closing the pools, instead of keeping them open on an integrated basis, create a "badge or incident" of slavery in violation of the Thirteenth Amendment?

Answers: No and no.

Majority:

  • Hugo Black (majority opinion)
  • Warren Burger (w/ concurrence)
  • John Marshall Harlan
  • Potter Stewart
  • Harry Blackmun (w/ concurrence)

Dissent:

  • William Douglas (w/ opinion)
  • Byron White (w/ opinion)
  • William Brennan
  • Thurgood Marshall (w/ opinion)
  continue reading

13 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide